Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673960›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Helpful strategies for GPs seeing patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms: a focus group study.

Aase Aamland, Anette Fosse, Eline Ree, Eirik Abildsnes, Kirsti Malterud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Medically unexplained symptoms: are we making progress?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Helpful strategies for GPs seeing patients with MUPS.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aase AamlandResearch Unit for General Practice, Bergen, Norway.
Anette FosseResearch Unit for General Practice, Bergen, Norway.
Eline ReeUniversity of Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Eirik AbildsnesDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Kirsti MalterudResearch Unit for General Practice, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with long-lasting and disabling medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are common in general practice. GPs have previously described the challenges regarding management and treatment of patients with MUPS.

aimTo explore GPs' experiences of the strategies perceived as helpful when seeing patients with MUPS. DESIGN AND

settingThree focus group interviews with a purposive sample of 24 experienced GPs were held in southern Norway.

methodDiscussions were audiotaped and transcribed. Systematic text condensation was used for analysis.

resultsSeveral strategies were considered helpful during consultations with patients with MUPS. A comprehensive outline of the patient's medical past and present could serve as the foundation of the dialogue. Reviewing the patient's records and sharing relevant information with them or conducting a thorough clinical examination could offer 'golden moments' of trust and common understanding. A very concrete exchange of symptoms and diagnosis interpretation sometimes created a space for explanations and action, and confrontations could even strengthen the alliance between the GP and the patient. Bypassing conventional answers and transcending tensions by negotiating innovative explanations could help patients resolve symptoms and establish innovative understanding.

conclusionGPs use tangible, down-to-earth strategies in consultations with patients with MUPS. Important strategies were: thorough investigation of the patient's symptoms and story; sharing of interpretations; and negotiation of different explanations. Sharing helpful strategies with colleagues in a field in which frustration and dissatisfaction are not uncommon can encourage GPs to develop sustainable responsibility and innovative solutions.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsGeneral PracticeMedically Unexplained SymptomsReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMedical History TakingMiddle AgedNorwayPhysical ExaminationPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Guidelines as Topicfocus groupsgeneral practiceprofessional practicequalitative researchsomatoform disorders

Identifiers

PMID28673960
PMCPMC5519129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.