SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017
Identifying primary care quality indicators for people with serious mental illness: a systematic review.
Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conjoint analyses of patients' preferences for primary care: a systematic review.BMC primary care · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Primary health care quality indicators: An umbrella review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Relevant Criteria for Improving Quality of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Treatment: A Delphi Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Experiences of physical healthcare services in Māori and non-Māori with mental health and substance use conditions.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Patients with severe mental illness and their carers' expectations for GPs' communication skills: a qualitative approach in Spain.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Interventions to Promote the Utilization of Physical Health Care for People with Severe Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Quality indicators and performance measures for prison healthcare: a scoping review.Health & justice · 2022Article
- Article
- Prevalence of mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review.Journal of participatory medicine · 2021Review
- Applying Care Coordination Principles to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in People With Serious Mental Illness: A Case Study Approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Are we missing the mark? Relationships of psychosocial issues to outcomes after injury: A review of OTA annual meeting presentations.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2020Article
- Implementing psychosocial programming at a level 1 trauma center: results from a 5-year period.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Article
- Article
- Reimagining mental health in primary care: a blueprint for STPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSerious mental illness (SMI) - which comprises long-term conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other psychoses - has enormous costs for patients and society. In many countries, people with SMI are treated solely in primary care, and have particular needs for physical care.
aimThe objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to create a list of quality indicators relevant to patients with SMI that could be captured using routine data, and which could be used to monitor or incentivise better-quality primary care. DESIGN AND
settingA systematic literature review, combined with a search of quality indicator databases and guidelines.
methodThe authors assessed whether indicators could be measured from routine data and the quality of the evidence.
resultsOut of 1847 papers and quality indicator databases identified, 27 were included, from which 59 quality indicators were identified, covering six domains. Of the 59 indicators, 52 could be assessed using routine data. The evidence base underpinning these indicators was relatively weak, and was primarily based on expert opinion rather than trial evidence.
conclusionWith appropriate adaptation for different contexts, and in line with the relative responsibilities of primary and secondary care, use of the quality indicators has the potential to improve care and to improve the physical and mental health of people with SMI. However, before the indicators can be used to monitor or incentivise primary care quality, more robust links need to be established, with improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.