Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673819›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2017

Automated tools for comparative sequence analysis of genic regions using the GenePalette application.

Andrew F Smith, James W Posakony, Mark Rebeiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew F SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
James W PosakonyDivision of Biological Sciences/CDB, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Mark RebeizDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: rebeiz@pitt.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF SENSORY ORGAN DEVELOPMENTR01GM046993 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POSAKONY, JAMES W. · 1992 to 2015
$3.5M
Tracing the recent origins of a gene network regulating a novel morphological strR01GM107387 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REBEIZ, MARK J · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046993NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative sequence analysis methods, such as phylogenetic footprinting, represent one of the most effective ways to decode regulatory sequence functions based upon DNA sequence information alone. The laborious task of assembling orthologous sequences to perform these comparisons is a hurdle to these analyses, which is further aggravated by the relative paucity of tools for visualization of sequence comparisons in large genic regions. Here, we describe a second-generation implementation of the GenePalette DNA sequence analysis software to facilitate comparative studies of gene function and regulation. We have developed an automated module called OrthologGrabber (OG) that performs BLAT searches against the UC Santa Cruz genome database to identify and retrieve segments homologous to a region of interest. Upon acquisition, sequences are compared to identify high-confidence anchor-points, which are graphically displayed. The visualization of anchor-points alongside other DNA features, such as transcription factor binding sites, allows users to precisely examine whether a binding site of interest is conserved, even if the surrounding region exhibits poor sequence identity. This approach also aids in identifying orthologous segments of regulatory DNA, facilitating studies of regulatory sequence evolution. As with previous versions of the software, GenePalette 2.1 takes the form of a platform-independent, single-windowed interface that is simple to use.

Indexed as

GenesAutomationBase SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomePhylogenySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNASequence HomologyUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID28673819
PMCPMC5623810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.