Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673357›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

Strong epistatic and additive effects of linked candidate SNPs for Drosophila pigmentation have implications for analysis of genome-wide association studies results.

Jean-Michel Gibert, Jorge Blanco, Marlies Dolezal, Viola Nolte, Frédérique Peronnet, Christian Schlötterer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Naturally Occurring Variability in the Regulatory Region of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Michel GibertSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Biologie du Développement Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (LBD-IBPS), case 24, 9 quai St-Bernard, 75005, Paris, France.
Jorge BlancoInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Wien, Austria.
Marlies DolezalInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Wien, Austria.
Viola NolteInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Wien, Austria.
Frédérique PeronnetSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Biologie du Développement Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (LBD-IBPS), case 24, 9 quai St-Bernard, 75005, Paris, France.
Christian SchlöttererInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Wien, Austria. Christian.Schloetterer@vetmeduni.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-4710-6526
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mapping resolution of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is limited by historic recombination events and effects are often assigned to haplotype blocks rather than individual SNPs. It is not clear how many of the SNPs in the block, and which ones, are causative. Drosophila pigmentation is a powerful model to dissect the genetic basis of intra-specific and inter-specific phenotypic variation. Three tightly linked SNPs in the t-MSE enhancer have been identified in three D. melanogaster populations as major contributors to female abdominal pigmentation. This enhancer controls the expression of the pigmentation gene tan (t) in the abdominal epidermis. Two of the three SNPs were confirmed in an independent study using the D. melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel established from a North American population.

resultsWe determined the functional impact of SNP1, SNP2, and SNP3 using transgenic lines to test all possible haplotypes in vivo. We show that all three candidate SNPs contribute to female Drosophila abdominal pigmentation. Interestingly, only two SNPs agree with the effect predicted by GWAS; the third one goes in the opposite direction because of linkage disequilibrium between multiple functional SNPs. Our experimental design uncovered strong additive effects for the three SNPs, but we also found significant epistatic effects explaining up to 11% of the total variation.

conclusionsOur results suggest that linked causal variants are important for the interpretation of GWAS and functional validation is needed to understand the genetic architecture of traits.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenetic LinkageGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaFemaleGenes, InsectPigmentationQuantitative Trait LociAdditivityDrosophilaEpistasisGenetic architectureGenome-wide associations studies (GWAS)Pigmentation

Identifiers

PMID28673357
PMCPMC5496195
OpenAlexW2727180246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.