Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673283›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Evaluating the comparative effectiveness of different demand side interventions to increase maternal health service utilization and practice of birth spacing in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: an innovative, mixed methods approach.

Mari Dumbaugh, Wyvine Bapolisi, Jennie van de Weerd, Michel Zabiti, Paula Mommers, Ghislain Bisimwa Balaluka, Sonja Merten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The differential effect of the free maternity services policy in Kenya.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mari DumbaughSwiss Tropical & Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Wyvine BapolisiEcole Régionale de Santé Publique, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Jennie van de WeerdCORDAID-Netherlands, The Hague, Netherlands.
Michel ZabitiCORDAID-Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Paula MommersCORDAID-Netherlands, The Hague, Netherlands.
Ghislain Bisimwa BalalukaEcole Régionale de Santé Publique, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Sonja MertenSwiss Tropical & Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. sonja.merten@swisstph.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4115-106X
Cordaid · NLSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversité Catholique de Bukavu · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this protocol we describe a mixed methods study in the province of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo evaluating the effectiveness of different demand side strategies to increase maternal health service utilization and the practice of birth spacing. Conditional service subsidization, conditional cash transfers and non-monetary incentives aim to encourage women to use maternal health services and practice birth spacing in two different health districts. Our methodology will comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches against each other and no intervention. METHODS/

designThis study comprises four main research activities: 1) Formative qualitative research to determine feasibility of planned activities and inform development of the quantitative survey; 2) A community-based, longitudinal survey; 3) A retrospective review of health facility records; 4) Qualitative exploration of intervention acceptability and emergent themes through in-depth interviews with program participants, non-participants, their partners and health providers. Female community health workers are engaged as core members of the research team, working in tandem with female survey teams to identify women in the community who meet eligibility criteria. Female community health workers also act as key informants and community entry points during methods design and qualitative exploration. Main study outcomes are completion of antenatal care, institutional delivery, practice of birth spacing, family planning uptake and intervention acceptability in the communities. Qualitative methods also explore decision making around maternal health service use, fertility preference and perceptions of family planning. DISCUSSION: The innovative mixed methods design allows quantitative data to inform the relationships and phenomena to be explored in qualitative collection. In turn, qualitative findings will be triangulated with quantitative findings. Inspired by the principles of grounded theory, qualitative analysis will begin while data collection is ongoing. This "conversation" between quantitative and qualitative data will result in a more holistic, context-specific exploration and understanding of research topics, including the mechanisms through which the interventions are or are not effective. In addition, engagement of female community health workers as core members of the research team roots research methods in the realities of the community and provides teams with key informants who are simultaneously implicated in the health system, community and target population.

Indexed as

Birth IntervalsCommunity Health WorkersResearch DesignAdolescentAdultComparative Effectiveness ResearchDemocratic Republic of the CongoFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CareCommunity health workersConditional cash transferDemand side financingDemocratic Republic of CongoFamily planningMaternal healthMixed methodsService utilizationStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID28673283
PMCPMC5496378
OpenAlexW2725509960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.