SynthesisBMC psychiatry2017
Dementia ascertainment using existing data in UK longitudinal and cohort studies: a systematic review of methodology.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of multidisciplinary psychiatric home treatment for elderly patients with mental illness: a systematic review of empirical studies.BMC psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Systemic Extracerebral Atherosclerotic Burden and Dementia Risk After Incident Stroke.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal associations of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome with midlife or late-life mental disorders and dementia, and the mediating role of metabolomic signature.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Dementia data for people living in care homes: cross-sectoral national data linkage study of care home, healthcare and administrative data sources.International journal of population data science · 2026Article
- Effect sizes of APOE e4 on the same general cognitive ability test taken by the same people from age 11 to age 90: The Lothian Birth Cohorts 1921 and 1936.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- A multinational cohort study of trends in survival following dementia diagnosis.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Leading determinants of incident dementia among individuals with and without the apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype: a retrospective cohort study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Seasonal Variations in Vitamin D Levels and the Incident Dementia Among Older Adults Aged ≥60 Years in the UK Biobank.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2024Article
- Identifying dementia using medical data linkage in a longitudinal cohort study: Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Leading mediators of sex differences in the incidence of dementia in community-dwelling adults in the UK Biobank: a retrospective cohort study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Association of antioxidants use with the risk of dementia among community-dwelling adults in the United Kingdom biobank.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Leucocyte telomere length, brain volume and risk of dementia: a prospective cohort study.General psychiatry · 2023Article
- The role of type 2 diabetes in the association between habitual glucosamine use and dementia: a prospective cohort study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2022Article
- Neurodegenerative disease risk among former international rugby union players.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2022Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of linked administrative data for dementia diagnosis in community-dwelling older men in Australia.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Risk of Suicide After Dementia Diagnosis.JAMA neurology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of routinely collected records for dementia outcomes in UK: a prospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Cardiometabolic multimorbidity, genetic risk, and dementia: a prospective cohort study.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2022Article
- Association of a wide range of chronic diseases and apolipoprotein E4 genotype with subsequent risk of dementia in community-dwelling adults: A retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies investigating the risk factors for or causation of dementia must consider subjects prior to disease onset. To overcome the limitations of prospective studies and self-reported recall of information, the use of existing data is key. This review provides a narrative account of dementia ascertainment methods using sources of existing data.
methodsThe literature search was performed using: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo and Web of Science. Included articles reported a UK-based study of dementia in which cases were ascertained using existing data. Existing data included that which was routinely collected and that which was collected for previous research. After removing duplicates, abstracts were screened and the remaining articles were included for full-text review. A quality tool was used to evaluate the description of the ascertainment methodology.
resultsOf the 3545 abstracts screened, 360 articles were selected for full-text review. 47 articles were included for final consideration. Data sources for ascertainment included: death records, national datasets, research databases and hospital records among others. 36 articles used existing data alone for ascertainment, of which 27 used only a single data source. The most frequently used source was a research database. Quality scores ranged from 7/16 to 16/16. Quality scores were better for articles with dementia ascertainment as an outcome. Some papers performed validation studies of dementia ascertainment and most indicated that observed rates of dementia were lower than expected.
conclusionsWe identified a lack of consistency in dementia ascertainment methodology using existing data. With no data source identified as a "gold-standard", we suggest the use of multiple sources. Where possible, studies should access records with evidence to confirm the diagnosis. Studies should also calculate the dementia ascertainment rate for the population being studied to enable a comparison with an expected rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.