ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
The clinical characteristics of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in patients with chronic renal failure.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- High risk and low incidence diseases: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- The kidney-brain pathogenic axis in severe falciparum malaria.Trends in parasitology · 2023Review
- Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with bilateral corticospinal tract involvement: a case report.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2021Article
- Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome due to unilateral renal artery stenosis: A case report.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have investigated posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). The present study analyzed the clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations and imaging features of PRES in patients with CRF. A total of 42 patients with CRF with or without PRES were recruited in the current retrospective case-control study. Patient data taken prior to the onset of PRES in patients with CRF and PRES (n=21) were collected and analyzed. At the same time, data from patients with CRF but without PRES (n=21) were also analyzed. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were collected from patients in the PRES group. The mean blood pressure of patients in the PRES group was significantly higher than that of the control group (systolic blood pressure: 172±15 mmHg vs. 135±14 mmHg, P<0.01; diastolic blood pressure: 95±16 mmHg vs. 64±13 mmHg, P<0.01). Furthermore, compared with the control group, mean serum albumin (Alb) and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in the PRES group were significantly lower (Alb: 29.1±5.3 g/l vs. 34.6±6.1 g/l, P=0.001; Hb: 74±16 g/l vs. 89±28 g/l, P=0.037). By contrast, mean LDH concentration was significantly higher in the PRES group (LDH: 336±141 U/l vs. 235±89 U/l, P=0.004). In the PRES group, 24 h urine volume was significantly lower in the PRES group than in the control group (24 h urine volume: 651±520 ml vs. 982±518 ml, P=0.046). No significant differences in levels of serum potassium (4.5±0.6 mmol/l vs. 4.4±0.5 mmol/l, P=0.377), sodium (138.3±4.9 mmol/l vs. 139.0±6.8 mmol/l, P=0.325), calcium (2.0±0.24 mmol/l vs. 1.9±0.24 mmol/l, P=0.673), alanine aminotransferase; (24±14 U/l vs. 18±8 U/l, P=0.975); aspartate aminotransferase (29±11 U/l vs. 24±9 U/l, P=0.619) and uric acid (448±148 µmol/l vs. 378±116 µmol/l, P=0.599) were found between the two groups. PRES is a relatively common nervous system complication arising in patients with CRF. Certain biochemical markers, including Hb and Alb, may be associated with PRES. Diagnosing PRES is difficult as computed tomography (CT) brain scans may be normal and MRI scans, which are more sensitive than CT scans at diagnosing PRES, are not always performed in patients with CRF. Thus, brain MRI scans should be taken first in such patients when PRES is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.