Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28673010›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017

Rhubarb vs. glycerin enema for treatment of critically ill patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

Bing Wan, Hao Zhang, Jiangtao Yin, Haiyan Fu, Yikun Chen, Liping Yang, Dadong Liu, Tangfeng Lv, Yong Song

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bing WanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Hao ZhangEmergency Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Jiangtao YinDepartment of ICU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Haiyan FuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Yikun ChenEmergency Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Liping YangEmergency Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Dadong LiuDepartment of ICU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Tangfeng LvDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Yong SongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Jiangsu University · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhubarb has been used as an evacuant for thousands of years. However, recent research has indicated that rhubarb inhibits inflammation and protects organ function. In the current study, the use of rhubarb was investigated in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Specifically, its dual role in attenuating lung and bowel injury by catharsis and inhibiting inflammation was evaluated. Patients in the glycerin group (n=56) received 110 ml of glycerin enema by coloclysis once daily for 7 to 9 days. Patients in the rhubarb group (n=56) were treated with a mixture of 0.3 g/kg body weight rhubarb powder in 100 ml warm water. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), intra-abdominal pressure, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were recorded. The duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), respiratory parameters, first day of enteral nutrition (EN), intensive care unit (ICU) hospital stay and 30-day mortality were also recorded. The APACHE II scores were significantly lower in the rhubarb group compared with the glycerin group from day 3 to 9 (P<0.05 at day 3 and 4; P<0.01 at day 5, 7 and 9). The SOFA scores were significantly lower in the rhubarb group compared with the glycerin group from day 5 to 9 (P<0.05). PCT levels were significantly lower from day 4 to 9 (P<0.05) and the CRP level was significantly lower from day 3 to 9 (P<0.05) in the rhubarb group compared with the glycerin group. The TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly lower in the rhubarb group compared with the glycerin group from day 3 to 9 (P<0.05 at day 3 and 4, P<0.01 at day 5, 7 and 9). The positive end-expiratory pressure and peak inspiratory pressure were significantly lower in the rhubarb group compared with the glycerin group at day 3, 5 and 7 (P<0.05 at day 3 and 5, P<0.01 at day 7), while the oxygenation index (P<0.05) and alveolar-arterial partial pressure of oxygen (P<0.05 at day 3 and 5, P<0.01 at day 7) were significantly improved. Significantly shorter durations of MV and ICU hospital stay, and earlier EN, were observed in the rhubarb group compared with the glycerin group (all P<0.05). Rhubarb treatment was indicated to be beneficial in IAH, by inhibiting inflammation and restoring intestinal function.

Indexed as

enemaenteral nutritionintra-abdominal hypertensionrespiratory failurerhubarb

Identifiers

PMID28673010
PMCPMC5488726
OpenAlexW2623690492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.