ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Comparative study on the biomechanics between improved PVP and traditional PKP in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of thoracolumbar kyphotic Cobb angle on prognosis after PKP surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating somatosensory evoked potentials in predicting treatment outcomes for thoracolumbar spinal compression fractures using closed reduction and over-extension techniques.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Application and modification of bone cement in vertebroplasty: A literature review.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2022Review
- Combined Application of Grid Body Surface Locator and Preemptive Analgesia in Daytime Vertebroplasty.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of PVP and PKP Combined With Triple Medication on Mild and Moderate Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture in the Elderly.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the biomechanics between improved percutaneous vertebroplasty (improved PVP) and traditional percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). A total of 15 vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF models of new calves (12-14 weeks) were treated with a decalcifying agent (Shandon TBD-1) with the vertebral compression fracture. The vertebral volume and anterior height before modeling, and the vertebral BMD before and after modeling were measured. The models were randomly divided into three groups: the improved PVP group (Group A), the traditional PKP group (Group B) and the control group (Group C). BMD of Groups A, B and C after decalcification was significantly lower than that before decalcification (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in BMD before and after decalcification among Groups A, B and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the initial strength and stiffness among the three groups (P>0.05). The postoperative strength of Groups A and B was 1.036±300 and 1.045±200 N, respectively, which was significantly higher than the initial strength (P<0.05). The postoperative stiffness of Groups A and B was 395±250 and 470±270 N/mm, respectively, which was slightly lower than the initial stiffness, however, the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the comparison of postoperative strength and stiffness between Groups A and B, the postoperative strength in Group A was lower than that in Group B; differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the postoperative stiffness between Groups A and B (P>0.05). There were no significant differences of injection of bone cement between the two groups (P>0.05). Therefore, an improved PVP can basically realize the curative effects of traditional PKP in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF, which can be used as clinical reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.