ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of primary central nervous system angiitis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Primary Angiitis of the CNS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Primary angiitis of the CNS and ANCA-associated vasculitis: from pathology to treatment.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- "When should primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) be suspected?": literature review and proposal of a preliminary screening algorithm.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Review
- An Unusual Cause of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Clinical Pearls Regarding Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System.Neurological sciences and neurosurgery · 2020Article
- Intracranial Atherosclerosis Versus Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System: a Case Report.Cureus · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study reported on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS). A total of 19 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of PACNS confirmed by clinical follow-up were enrolled in the present study. All patients underwent unenhanced and enhanced MRI prior to and after steroids or steroids plus immunosuppressive therapy. At baseline, all patients showed lesions on MRI in the grey and white matter. Lesions presented as slightly hypointense on T1-weighted images (T1WI), slightly hyperintense on T2WI, hyperintense on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, iso- or slightly hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and hyperintense on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. After contrast injection, the lesions showed patchy, cord-like or goral enhancement. Seven cases had unilateral lesions and the other 12 cases had bilateral lesions. On all sequences, indistinct margins characterised most of the lesions, and certain lesions were oedematous. Treatment with steroids or steroids plus immunosuppressive agents resulted in improvement or disappearance of symptoms, and seventeen patients had evidently improved according to MRI. In conclusion, PACNS has unique characteristics on MRI; DWI, ADC mapping and enhanced images are of great importance for the diagnosis and clinical management of early-stage PACNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.