Eu@C

Zdeněk Slanina, Filip Uhlík, Shigeru Nagase, Takeshi Akasaka, Ludwik Adamowicz, Xing Lu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Trapping an unprecedented TiChemical science · 2019
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zdeněk SlaninaState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Material Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China. zdeneks@email.arizona.edu.

Filip UhlíkDepartment of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic. uhlik@sals.natur.cuni.cz.

Shigeru NagaseFukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8103, Japan. nagase@ims.ac.jp.

Takeshi AkasakaState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Material Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China. akasaka@tara.tsukuba.ac.jp.

Ludwik AdamowiczDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0041, USA. ludwik@email.arizona.edu.

Xing LuState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Material Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China. lux@hust.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relative concentrations of six isomeric Eu@C 72 -one based on the IPR C 72 cage (i.e., obeying the isolated-pentagon rule, IPR), two cages with a pentagon-pentagon junction (symmetries C 2 and C 2 v ), a cage with one heptagon, a cage with two heptagons, and a cage with two pentagon-pentagon fusions-are DFT computed using the Gibbs energy in a broad temperature interval. It is shown that the two non-IPR isomers with one pentagon-pentagon junction prevail at any relevant temperature and exhibit comparable populations. The IPR-satisfying structure is disfavored by both energy and entropy.

Indexed as

FullerenesIsomerismModels, MolecularTemperatureFullerenesmetallofullerenesnon-IPR fullerenesrelative populations of isomers

Identifiers

PMID28672819

DOI10.3390/molecules22071053

PMCPMC6152253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.