ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Recent Progress in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Cancer Biomarkers: A Review.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication of Co-Doped Covalent Organic Framework Nanosheets with Mild Interlayer Stress for Quantitative Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers.Biosensors · 2026Article
- On the Use of Ag/AgCl Reference Electrode in Silicon Nanowire Field Effect Transistors for pH and Biosensing Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Electrochemical Detection of Cancer Biomarkers: From Molecular Sensing to Clinical Translation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- MXene-based electrochemical sensors for cancer biomarker detection: current trends, challenges, and future directions.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Fabrication of serum-based SERS-tailored 3D structures for thyroid cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in the Fabrication and Application of Electrochemical Paper-Based Analytical Devices.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Advancement in Biosensor Technologies of 2D MaterialIntegrated with Cellulose-Physical Properties.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Protein Adsorption and Its Effects on Electroanalytical Performance of Nanocellulose/Carbon Nanotube Composite Electrodes.Biomacromolecules · 2023Article
- The Method and Study of Detecting Phenanthrene in Seawater Based on a Carbon Nanotube-Chitosan Oligosaccharide Modified Electrode Immunosensor.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in MXene-Based Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors for Neurotransmitter Detection.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Application of Various Optical and Electrochemical Nanobiosensors for Detecting Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125): A Review.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Recent Progress in Biosensors for Detection of Tumor Biomarkers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Tuning gold-based surface functionalization for streptavidin detection: A combined simulative and experimental study.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Markers.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
- Recent Progress in Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of MicroRNA.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Determination of VEGFMikrochimica acta · 2021Article
- Recent advances in aptamer-based sensors for breast cancer diagnosis: special cases for nanomaterial-based VEGF, HER2, and MUC1 aptasensors.Mikrochimica acta · 2020Review
- Enhancing the Sensitivity of Biotinylated Surfaces by Tailoring the Design of the Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayer Synthesis.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Biosensors for Personal Mobile Health: A System Architecture Perspective.Advanced materials technologies · 2020Article
- Graphene-based biosensors for the detection of prostate cancer protein biomarkers: a review.BMC chemistry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews recent progress in the development of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for cancer biomarkers. Because of their high electrical conductivity, high affinity to biomolecules, and high surface area-to-weight ratios, nanomaterials, including metal nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and graphene, have been used for fabricating electrochemical biosensors. Electrodes are often coated with nanomaterials to increase the effective surface area of the electrodes and immobilize a large number of biomolecules such as enzymes and antibodies. Alternatively, nanomaterials are used as signaling labels for increasing the output signals of cancer biomarker sensors, in which nanomaterials are conjugated with secondary antibodies and redox compounds. According to this strategy, a variety of biosensors have been developed for detecting cancer biomarkers. Recent studies show that using nanomaterials is highly advantageous in preparing high-performance biosensors for detecting lower levels of cancer biomarkers. This review focuses mainly on the protocols for using nanomaterials to construct cancer biomarker sensors and the performance characteristics of the sensors. Recent trends in the development of cancer biomarker sensors are discussed according to the nanomaterials used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.