Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28672226›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2017

Proactive and reactive inhibitory control in eating disorders.

Savani Bartholdy, Samantha J Rennalls, Claire Jacques, Hollie Danby, Iain C Campbell, Ulrike Schmidt, Owen G O'Daly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impulsivity and compulsivity in binge eating disorder: A systematic review of behavioral studies.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Current perspectives on brain circuits involved in food addiction-like behaviors.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prefrontal Responses during Proactive and Reactive Inhibition Are Differentially Impacted by Stress in Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evidence for a sex-specific contribution of polygenic load for anorexia nervosa to body weight and prefrontal brain structure in nonclinical individuals.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Savani BartholdySection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. Electronic address: savani.bartholdy@kcl.ac.uk.
Samantha J RennallsDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Claire JacquesDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Hollie DanbyDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Iain C CampbellSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Owen G O'DalyDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered inhibitory control has been implicated in the development and maintenance of eating disorders (ED), however it is unclear how different types of inhibitory control are affected across the EDs. We explored whether individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED) and anorexia nervosa (AN) differed from healthy individuals (HC) on two types of motor inhibitory control: proactive inhibition (related to the preparation/initiation of a response) and reactive inhibition (withholding a response in reaction to a signal). Ninety-four women (28 AN, 27 BN, 11 BED, 28 HC) completed two neuropsychological tasks (a cued reaction time task and a stop signal task), and questionnaires assessing clinical variables, mood, anxiety, and inhibitory control. Self-reported inhibitory control was poorer in women with BN compared to the HC and AN groups, but greater in women with AN compared to all other groups. However, no group differences in reactive inhibition were observed. Proactive inhibition was augmented in women with AN compared to HC, and this was related to self-reported intolerance of uncertainty. The findings suggest that proactive inhibition may be a relevant target for behavioural interventions for AN, and call for further research into the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and proactive inhibition.

Indexed as

Proactive InhibitionReactive InhibitionAdultAnorexia NervosaBinge-Eating DisorderBulimia NervosaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansSelf ReportUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID28672226
PMCPMC5555256
OpenAlexW2657218516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.