ArticlePloS one2017
DiapHRaGM: A mnemonic to describe the work of breathing in patients with respiratory failure.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altered PI3K/mTOR Signaling within the Forebrain Leads to Respiratory Deficits in a Mouse Model of Epilepsy.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Assessing inspiratory drive and effort in critically ill patients at the bedside.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- A MEMS seismometer respiratory monitor for work of breathing assessment and adventitious lung sounds detection via deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bedside Assessment of the Respiratory System During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Kinematic signature of high risk labored breathing revealed by novel signal analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Work of Breathing: Physiology, Measurement, and Diagnostic Value in Childhood Pneumonia.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- POMSNAME: an aide-mémoire to improve the assessment and documentation of palliative care - a longitudinal project.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Development of a Medium Care Unit Using an Inexperienced Respiratory Staff: Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Multimode optical fiber specklegram smart bed sensor array.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe assessment of the work of breathing in the definitions of respiratory failure is vague and variable.
objectiveIdentify a parsimonious set of signs to describe the work of breathing in hypoxemic, acutely ill patients.
methodsWe examined consecutive medical ICU patients receiving oxygen with a mask, non-invasive ventilation, or T-piece. A physician inspected each patient for 10 seconds, rated the level of respiratory distress, and then examined the patient for vital signs and 17 other physical signs. We used the rating of distress as a surrogate for measuring the work of breathing, constructed three multivariate models to identify the one with the smallest number of signs and largest explained variance, and validated it with bootstrap analysis.
resultsWe performed 402 observations on 240 patients. Respiratory distress was absent in 78, mild in 157, moderate in 107, and severe in 60. Respiratory rate, hypoxia, heart rate, and frequency of most signs increased as distress increased. Respiratory rate and hypoxia explained 43% of the variance in respiratory distress. Diaphoresis, gasping, and contraction of the sternomastoid explained an additional 28%. Heart rate, blood pressure, alertness, agitation, body posture, nasal flaring, audible breathing, cyanosis, tracheal tug, retractions, paradox, scalene or abdominal muscles contraction did not increase the explained variance in respiratory distress.
conclusionMost of the variance is respiratory distress can be explained by five signs summarized by the mnemonic DiapHRaGM (diaphoresis, hypoxia, respiratory rate, gasping, accessory muscle). This set of signs may allow for efficient, standardized assessments of the work of breathing of hypoxic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.