Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28671677›Full record

ArticleOncogenesis2017

Effects of proton versus photon irradiation on (lymph)angiogenic, inflammatory, proliferative and anti-tumor immune responses in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

M Lupu-Plesu, A Claren, S Martial, P-D N'Diaye, K Lebrigand, N Pons, D Ambrosetti, I Peyrottes, J Feuillade, J Hérault and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogenesis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Motion-based tissueClinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M Lupu-PlesuUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
A ClarenUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
S MartialUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
P-D N'DiayeUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
K LebrigandUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
N PonsUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
D AmbrosettiUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
I PeyrottesCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
J FeuilladeCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
J HéraultCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
M DufiesUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
J DoyenUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
G PagèsUniversity of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne · FRInstitut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement de Nice · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proximity of organs at risk makes the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) challenging by standard radiotherapy. The higher precision in tumor targeting of proton (P) therapy could promote it as the treatment of choice for HNSCC. Besides the physical advantage in dose deposition, few is known about the biological impact of P versus photons (X) in this setting. To investigate the comparative biological effects of P versus X radiation in HNSCC cells, we assessed the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), viability, proliferation and mRNA levels for genes involved in (lymph)angiogenesis, inflammation, proliferation and anti-tumor immunity. These parameters, particularly VEGF-C protein levels and regulations, were documented in freshly irradiated and/or long-term surviving cells receiving low/high-dose, single (SI)/multiple (MI) irradiations with P/X. The RBE was found to be 1.1 Key (lymph)angiogenesis and inflammation genes were downregulated (except for vegf-c) after P and upregulated after X irradiation in MI surviving cells, demonstrating a more favorable profile after P irradiation. Both irradiation types stimulated vegf-c promoter activity in a NF-κB-dependent transcriptional regulation manner, but at a lesser extent after P, as compared to X irradiation, which correlated with mRNA and protein levels. The cells surviving to MI by P or X generated tumors with higher volume, anarchic architecture and increased density of blood vessels. Increased lymphangiogenesis and a transcriptomic analysis in favor of a more aggressive phenotype were observed in tumors generated with X-irradiated cells. Increased detection of lymphatic vessels in relapsed tumors from patients receiving X radiotherapy was consistent with these findings. This study provides new data about the biological advantage of P, as compared to X irradiation. In addition to its physical advantage in dose deposition, P irradiation may help to improve treatment approaches for HNSCC.

Identifiers

PMID28671677
PMCPMC5541708
OpenAlexW2725271626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.