ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018
Performance of a fast and high-resolution multi-echo spin-echo sequence for prostate T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined ADC and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimal Selection of the Effective Echo Time (TEJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Quantitative synthetic MRI improves peripheral zone prostate cancer detection beyond PI-RADS v2.1.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Apparent diffusion coefficient as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer treatment response on a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-linear accelerator: Impact of image registration and acquisition type.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Anatomical zone and tissue type impacts the repeatability of quantitative MRI parameters and radiomic features for longitudinal monitoring of treatment response in the prostate.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of quantitative relaxometry for prostate target localization and response assessment in magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques in head and neck healthy structures involved in the salivary and swallowing function: Accuracy and repeatability.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- T2 mapping for the characterization of prostate lesions.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation Was Used in Conjunction with Prostate PI-RADS v2.1 Score Has Diagnostic Relevance for Benign and Malignant Prostate Lesions.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Feasibility of Novel Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting of the Prostate Gland: Phantom and Clinical Studies.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Daily Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) In Prostate Cancer Patients During MR-Guided Radiotherapy-A Multicenter Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Clinical utility of combined T2-weighted imaging and T2-mapping in the detection of prostate cancer: a multi-observer study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- Targeted Biopsy Validation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Diffusion Mapping.Investigative radiology · 2019Article
- Quantitative 3T multiparametric MRI of benign and malignant prostatic tissue in patients with and without local recurrent prostate cancer after external-beam radiation therapy.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Article
- Quantitative MRI Changes During Weekly Ultra-Hypofractionated Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy With Integrated Boost.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Investigation of the Value of T 2 Mapping in the Prediction of Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the performance of a multi-echo spin-echo sequence with k-t undersampling scheme (k-t T
methodsPhantom experiments were performed at five systems to estimate the bias, short-term repeatability, and reproducibility across all systems expressed with the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Monthly measurements were performed on two systems for long-term repeatability estimation. To evaluate clinical repeatability, two T
resultsPhantom measurements showed a small bias (median = -0.9 ms) and good short-term repeatability (median wCV = 0.5%). Long-term repeatability was 0.9 and 1.1% and reproducibility between systems was 1.7%. The median bias observed in patients was -1.1 ms. At voxel level, the median wCV was 15%, dropping to 4% for structures of 0.5 cm
conclusionsReproducible T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.