ArticleAnnals of African medicine
Evaluation of locked plate in the osteosynthesis of fractures in osteoporotic bones.
Article in Annals of African medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plate fixation vs. intramedullary nailing: Which is more cost-effective for tibial shaft fractures?Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of conventional dynamic compression plates (DCPs) in osteoporotic bones is associated with higher chances of implant failure. The advent and use of locking combi-plates have ensured a stable construct during osteosynthesis of fractures in osteoporotic bones.
objectivesThe study aims to assess the outcome of use of locking combi-plates in the management of fractures in osteoporotic bones in our environment. MATERIALS AND
methodsCases of patients with nonunion and localized osteoporosis from January 2014 to December 2014 that were managed with locked combi-plates were reviewed. Outcome was assessed by time to healing, stability of implant construct after 6 and 12 months.
resultsThere were 10 patients with mean age of 47.4 ± 12.63 years. There were 9 males and 1 female, and road traffic crashes were the mechanism of injury in 90% (n = 9) and gunshot injuries in 10% (n = 1). Atrophic nonunion was the most common indication for osteosynthesis with 80%, followed by fibrous nonunion with 10.0%. The humerus was the most common long bone involved with 50%. Locked broad DCP was used in 62.5%, and the duration between initial injury and surgery was 6 and 48 months, with an average of 17.5 months. The outcome was such that 90% healed after 12 months on follow-up while one case had the implant backing out and delay union at 6 months.
conclusionThe use of locked plate in the management of nonunion in the presence of osteoporosis ensures stable fixation construct and healing. Contexte: L'utilisation de plaques de compression dynamiques conventionnelles dans les os ostéoporotiques est associée à des chances plus élevées de défaillance de l'implant. L'avènement et l'utilisation de combi-plaques de verrouillage ont assuré une construction stable lors de l'ostéosyntheis de fractures dans les os ostéoporotiques. Objectifs: L'étude vise à évaluer le résultat de l'utilisation de combi-plaques de verrouillage dans la gestion des fractures dans les os ostéoporotiques dans notre environnement. Méthodologie: Les cas de patients atteints d'ostéoporose non syndiquée et localisée de janvier 2014 à décembre 2014 qui ont été gérés avec des combi-plaques verrouillées ont été examinés. Le résultat a été évalué par le temps de guérison, la stabilité de la construction d'implant après 6 et 12 mois. Résultats: il y avait 10 patients avec un âge moyen de 47,4 12,63. Il y avait 9 hommes et 1 accident de la route et de la route était le mécanisme de la blessure dans 90% (n = 9) et les blessures par balle dans 10% (n = 1). La non-union atrophique était l'indication la plus courante pour l'ostéosynthèse avec 80%, suivie d'une non-union fibreuse avec 10,0%. L'humérus était l'os le plus fréquent impliqué avec 50%. La plaque de compression dynamique bloquée (DCP) a été utilisée à 62,5% et la durée entre la blessure initiale et la chirurgie était de 6 et 48 mois avec une moyenne de 17,5 mois. Le résultat était tel que 90% ont été guéris après 12 mois de suivi, tandis que 1 cas avait l'implantation de l'implant et retardé l'union à 6 mois.
conclusionL'utilisation de la plaque verrouillée dans la gestion de la non-union en présence d'ostéoporose assure une construction stable de fixation et une guérison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.