Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28670708›Full record

SynthesisHealth services research2018

Do Patient-Centered Medical Homes Improve Health Behaviors, Outcomes, and Experiences of Low-Income Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Emily Doucette, Fred Rottnek, William Manard, Mayra Aragon Prada, Rachel Hughes, Tyler Lawrence, F David Schneider

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carissa van den Berk-ClarkDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-3787
Emily DoucetteDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Fred RottnekDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
William ManardDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Mayra Aragon PradaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Rachel HughesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Tyler LawrenceDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
F David SchneiderDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine: (1) what elements of patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are typically provided to low-income populations, (2) whether PCMHs improve health behaviors, experiences, and outcomes for low-income groups. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingExisting literature on PCMH utilization among health care organizations serving low-income populations. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsWe obtained papers through existing systematic and literature reviews and via PubMed, Web of Science, and the TRIP databases, which examined PCMHs serving low-income populations. A total of 434 studies were reviewed. Thirty-three articles met eligibility criteria. PRINCIPAL

findingsPatient-centered medical home interventions usually were composed of five of the six recommended components. Overall positive effect of PCMH interventions was d = 0.247 (range -0.965 to 1.42). PCMH patients had better clinical outcomes (d = 0.395), higher adherence (0.392), and lower utilization of emergency rooms (d = -0.248), but there were apparent limitations in study quality.

conclusionsEvidence shows that the PCMH model can increase health outcomes among low-income populations. However, limitations to quality include no assessment for confounding variables. Implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeChronic DiseaseEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services ResearchHealth StatusHumansMedically UninsuredMental HealthPatient-Centered CarePatient CompliancePovertyimplementationPatient-centered medical homepovertyunderserved patients

Identifiers

PMID28670708
PMCPMC5980195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.