ReviewHeart failure reviews2017
Decision making in advanced heart failure: bench, bedside, practice, and policy.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying and overcoming barriers to referral in advanced heart failure. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Hopes, expectations, and informational needs in patients undergoing advanced heart failure therapy evaluations.JHLT open · 2024Article
- Clinical Decision-Making for Heart Failure in Kosovo: A Conjoint Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Determining the factors for interhospital transfer in advanced heart failure cases.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Prospective evaluation of health status, quality of life and clinical outcomes following implantable defibrillator generator exchange.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2021Article
- Why has positive inotropy failed in chronic heart failure? Lessons from prior inotrope trials.European journal of heart failure · 2019Review
- Framework for improving outcome prediction for acute to chronic low back pain transitions.Pain reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This is an exciting time for patient-centered care. The window of opportunity appears to be open for the medical culture to accept the importance of the patients' values, goals and preferences in guiding medical decisions. Heart failure guidelines are changing to include language around shared decision making for major procedures and end-of-life care. However, while the cultural norms appear to be moving in this direction, the science regarding how to best deliver patient centered care (basic, clinical, delivery, and policy) is still developing. This article will provide a broad overview of the science of decision making in advanced heart failure using a translational science framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.