ArticleLanguage, cognition and neuroscience2017
Transcranial electric stimulation for the investigation of speech perception and comprehension.
Article in Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Trial
- Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation as an Adjuvant for Nonfluent Aphasia: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Bibliometric mapping of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (NIBS) for fluent speech production.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates language-related inhibitory processes in bilinguals: evidence from event-related potentials.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Perception of Rhythmic Speech Is Modulated by Focal Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- Noninvasive neurostimulation of left temporal lobe disrupts rapid talker adaptation in speech processing.Brain and language · 2019Article
- Cholinergic nervous system and glaucoma: From basic science to clinical applications.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2019Review
- Evidence for the Rhythmic Perceptual Sampling of Auditory Scenes.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neural correlates of sine-wave speech intelligibility in human frontal and temporal cortex.Brain and language · 2018Article
- Neural Prediction Errors Distinguish Perception and Misperception of Speech.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Phase Entrainment of Brain Oscillations Causally Modulates Neural Responses to Intelligible Speech.Current biology : CB · 2018Article
- Insights Into Auditory Cortex Dynamics From Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
- Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) Shapes the Processing of Rapidly Changing Auditory Information.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation (tES), comprising transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), involves applying weak electrical current to the scalp, which can be used to modulate membrane potentials and thereby modify neural activity. Critically, behavioural or perceptual consequences of this modulation provide evidence for a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.