ArticleBiomicrofluidics2017
Effects of living cells on the bioink printability during laser printing.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Quantitative Printability Framework for Programmable Assembly of Pre-Vascular Patterns via Laser-Induced Forward Transfer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Article
- Harnessing native blueprints for designing bioinks to bioprint functional cardiac tissue.iScience · 2025Review
- Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2025Review
- Review
- Laser-induced forward transfer based laser bioprinting in biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Laser Bioprinting of Cells Using UV and Visible Wavelengths: A Comparative DNA Damage Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Parametric Study of Jet/Droplet Formation Process during LIFT Printing of Living Cell-Laden Bioink.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Vascularisation of pluripotent stem cell-derived myocardium: biomechanical insights for physiological relevance in cardiac tissue engineering.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021Review
- Laser-induced Forward Transfer Hydrogel Printing: A Defined Route for Highly Controlled Process.International journal of bioprinting · 2020Article
- Biofabrication of 3D cell-encapsulated tubular constructs using dynamic optical projection stereolithography.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2019Article
- Micropatterning of endothelial cells to create a capillary-like network with defined architecture by laser-assisted bioprinting.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2019Article
- Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes.Applied physics reviews · 2018Review
- 3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2018Review
- Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine.Nature reviews. Materials · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser-induced forward transfer has been a promising orifice-free bioprinting technique for the direct writing of three-dimensional cellular constructs from cell-laden bioinks. In order to optimize the printing performance, the effects of living cells on the bioink printability must be carefully investigated in terms of the ability to generate well-defined jets during the jet/droplet formation process as well as well-defined printed droplets on a receiving substrate during the jet/droplet deposition process. In this study, a time-resolved imaging approach has been implemented to study the jet/droplet formation and deposition processes when printing cell-free and cell-laden bioinks under different laser fluences. It is found that the jetting behavior changes from no material transferring to well-defined jetting with or without an initial bulgy shape to jetting with a bulgy shape/pluming/splashing as the laser fluence increases. Under desirable well-defined jetting, two impingement-based deposition and printing types are identified: droplet-impingement printing and jet-impingement printing with multiple breakups. Compared with cell-free bioink printing, the transfer threshold of the cell-laden bioink is higher while the jet velocity, jet breakup length, and printed droplet size are lower, shorter, and smaller, respectively. The addition of living cells transforms the printing type from jet-impingement printing with multiple breakups to droplet-impingement printing. During the printing of cell-laden bioinks, two non-ideal jetting behaviors, a non-straight jet with a non-straight trajectory and a straight jet with a non-straight trajectory, are identified mainly due to the local nonuniformity and nonhomogeneity of cell-laden bioinks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.