ArticleKorean journal of radiology
Analysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.
Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter Assessment of Postoperative MastocheckCancers · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes of automated breast ultrasound: considerations for screening modality selection, based on a prospective observational survey.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Screening in Asian Countries: Epidemiology, Screening Practices, Outcomes, Challenges, and Future Directions.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Biennial Mammography Performance in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program From 2009 to 2020.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.European radiology · 2023Article
- The usefulness of a three-protein signature blood assay (Mastocheck®) for follow-up after breast cancer surgery.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Enhancement Technique Based on the Breast Density Level for Mammogram for Computer-Aided Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of participation and performance indicators in a breast cancer screening program in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2022Article
- Automated breast US as the primary screening test for breast cancer among East Asian women aged 40-49 years: a multicenter prospective study.European radiology · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing breast cancer mortality.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Effect of Different Types of Mammography Equipment on Screening Outcomes: A Report by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Prevalence of Women with Dense Breasts in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.Cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Five-Year Overall Survival of Interval Breast Cancers is Better than Non- Interval Cancers from Korean Breast Cancer Registry.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals.Korean journal of radiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze participant factors that affect the diagnostic performance of screening mammography. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe enrolled 128756 cases from 10 hospitals between 2005 and 2010. We analyzed recall rate, cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 examinations, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), and interval cancer rate (ICR) per 1000 negative examinations according to participant factors including age, breast density, and number of visit to the same institution, and adjusted for confounding variables.
resultsIncreasing age improved recall rates (27.4% in 40's, 17.5% in 50's, 11.1% in 60's, and 8.6% in 70's), CDR (2.7, 3.2, 2.0, and 2.4), PPV (1.0, 1.8, 1.8, and 2.8%), sensitivity (81.3, 88.8, 90.3, and 94.7%), specificity (72.7, 82.7, 89.0, and 91.7%), and FPR (27.3, 17.3, 11.0, and 8.4%) (
conclusionYoung age and dense breasts negatively affected diagnostic performance in mammography screening, whereas successive visits to the same institution had a positive effect. Examinee education for successive visits to the same institution would improve the diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.