Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28670028›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Anthropometric study of the knee in patients with osteoarthritis: intraoperative measurement versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Fabrício Bolpato Loures, Renato Janetti Carrara, Rogério Franco de Araújo Góes, Rodrigo Sattamini Pires E Albuquerque, João Maurício Barretto, André Kinder, Vinicius Schott Gameiro, Edson Marchiori

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fabrício Bolpato LouresMSc, Knee Surgeon at Hospital Santa Teresa, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
Renato Janetti CarraraMember of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology; MD, Intern in Knee Surgery at Hospital Santa Teresa, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
Rogério Franco de Araújo GóesMember of the Brazilian Society of Knee Surgery; Head of the Professor Donato D'Ângelo Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Santa Teresa, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
Rodrigo Sattamini Pires E AlbuquerquePhD, Adjunct Professor at the Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
João Maurício BarrettoPhD, Member of the Center for Knee Surgery at the Instituto Nacional de Traumatología e Ortopedia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
André KinderMSc, MD, Radiologist at the Clínica Multimagem, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
Vinicius Schott GameiroPhD, Associate Professor at the Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Edson MarchioriPhD, Full Professor at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Hospital Madre Teresa · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BRCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRInstituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare intraoperative measurements of the knee with those obtained by magnetic resonance imaging, in order to validate the latter method for use in anthropometric studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe studied 20 knees in 20 patients with osteoarthritis, all of whom underwent total arthroplasty between August and December of 2013. We took six measurements in the distal femur and two in the proximal tibia. Using the information system of the institution, we made the measurements on magnetic resonance imaging scans that had been obtained in the axial plane. Intraoperative measurements were obtained using a caliper, after the initial cuts made during the arthroplasty. The anatomical parameters determined by magnetic resonance imaging were the same as those determined by intraoperative measurement. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used in order to assess the level of agreement in anthropometric measurements of the knee performed by magnetic resonance imaging and by intraoperative measurement.

resultsStatistical analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between the knee anthropometric parameters of the knee determined by intraoperative measurement and those determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

conclusionThe dimensions of osteoarthritic knees measured by magnetic resonance imaging were similar to those measured intraoperatively. Therefore, magnetic resonance imaging can be considered a reliable method for use in large-scale anthropometric studies that will allow the available implants to be adapted and improved.

Indexed as

AnthropometryDiagnostic imagingKneeMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritisProstheses

Identifiers

PMID28670028
PMCPMC5487231
OpenAlexW2652503164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.