Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28669996›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2017

Male great tits assort by personality during the breeding season.

Katerina V-A Johnson, Lucy M Aplin, Ella F Cole, Damien R Farine, Josh A Firth, Samantha C Patrick, Ben C Sheldon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A guide to choosing and implementing reference models for social network analysis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating models of human behaviour between the individual and population levels to inform conservation interventions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The ontogeny of social networks in wild great tits (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katerina V-A JohnsonUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
Lucy M AplinUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
Ella F ColeUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
Damien R FarineUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
Josh A FirthUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
Samantha C PatrickUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
Ben C SheldonUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, U.K.
University of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal personalities can influence social interactions among individuals, and thus have major implications for population processes and structure. Few studies have investigated the significance of the social context of animal personalities, and such research has largely focused on the social organization of nonterritorial populations. Here we address the question of whether exploratory behaviour, a well-studied personality trait, is related to the social structure of a wild great tit,

Indexed as

exploration behaviourgreat titParus majorpersonalitysocial networks

Identifiers

PMID28669996
PMCPMC5478380
OpenAlexW2610706882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.