Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28669152›Full record

ReviewAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2017

Cervical Cancer Screening in Resource-Constrained Countries: Current Status and Future Directions

Ruchika Gupta, Sanjay Gupta, Ravi Mehrotra, Pushpa Sodhani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06810427 (A Novel, Low-Cost, Handheld 3D Imaging System for Improved Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Resource-Limited Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06810427 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Novel, Low-Cost, Handheld 3D Imaging System for Improved Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Resource-Limited Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarilion ClinicRan2025 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsCervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaArmsCervImage device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A novel methylation marker on theFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DOST: A consolidated health behavior model that maps factors influencing cancer screening uptake.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruchika GuptaDivision of Cytopathology, National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India. Email: sodhanip@ yahoo.com
Sanjay Gupta
Ravi Mehrotra
Pushpa Sodhani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer continues to be a major public health problem affecting large numbers of women in many developing countries. Limitations of various screening modalities and the lack of ready availability of a cost-effective point-of-care screening tool have hindered the efficient implementation of population-based screening programs in these settings. It has not proved possible for many countries to adopt cytology as a screening modality due to inadequate infrastructure and trained manpower. However, recent developments, notably design and testing of a low-cost HPV test kit and initiatives by countries like India in developing and putting into operation a framework for large-scale screening of women, have raised hopes that cervical cancer control may be possible even in resource-constrained locations. With the advent of HPV vaccination, primary prevention of cervical cancer also seems a distinct possibility. However, wide availability and acceptability of vaccination is still an unresolved issue for developing countries. The possible future effects of vaccination on test characteristics of various screening strategies also need to be evaluated. This review gathers information on the current status of cervical cancer screening with a special focus on low resource settings. It revisits the strengths and limitations of the available screening modalities for cervical cancer viz. cytology, visual methods and HPV testing, in the context of their applicability in developing countries. In addition, the role of newer HPV-detection methods, for instance DNA, RNA and protein-based techniques, in triage of screen-positive women is discussed. The contemporary issue of impact of HPV vaccination on cervical cancer screening is also addressed briefly. The main highlight of the review is the reference to ‘operational framework guidelines’ for population-based cervical cancer screening, which have recently been formulated and are in the process of being implemented in India. The guidelines may serve as a model for other similar low-resource settings where implementation of cancer screening is desired.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerHPVlow resource settingsscreeningvaccination

Identifiers

PMID28669152
PMCPMC6373785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.