Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28669011›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuro-oncology2017

Extent of resection and Carmustine wafer implantation safely improve survival in patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single center experience of the current practice.

Alexandre Roux, Sophie Peeters, Marc Zanello, Rabih Bou Nassif, Georges Abi Lahoud, Edouard Dezamis, Eduardo Parraga, Emmanuelle Lechapt-Zalcmann, Frédéric Dhermain, Sarah Dumont and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Glioma Cell Membrane-Coated CaCOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre RouxDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Sophie PeetersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Marc ZanelloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Rabih Bou NassifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Georges Abi LahoudDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Edouard DezamisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Eduardo ParragaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Emmanuelle Lechapt-ZalcmannParis Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Frédéric DhermainDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy University Hospital, Villejuif, France.
Sarah DumontDepartment of Neurooncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Guillaume LouvelDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy University Hospital, Villejuif, France.
Fabrice ChretienParis Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Xavier SauvageonParis Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Bertrand DevauxDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France.
Catherine OppenheimParis Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Johan PalludDepartment of Neurosurgery, Service de Neurochirurgie, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France. j.pallud@ch-sainte-anne.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-9844
Délégation Paris 5 · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For newly diagnosed glioblastomas treated with resection in association with the standard combined chemoradiotherapy, the impact of Carmustine wafer implantation remains debated regarding postoperative infections, quality of life, and feasibility of adjuvant oncological treatments. To assess together safety, tolerance and efficacy of Carmustine wafer implantation and of extent of resection for glioblastoma patients in real-life experience. Observational retrospective monocentric study including 340 consecutive adult patients with a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma who underwent surgical resection with (n = 123) or without (n = 217) Carmustine wafer implantation as first-line oncological treatment. Carmustine wafer implantation and extent of resection did not significantly increase postoperative complications, including postoperative infections (p = 0.269, and p = 0.446, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation and extent of resection did not significantly increase adverse events during adjuvant oncological therapies (p = 0.968, and p = 0.571, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation did not significantly alter the early postoperative Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.402) or the Karnofsky performance status after oncological treatment (p = 0.636) but a subtotal or total surgical resection significantly improved those scores (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation, subtotal and total resection, and standard combined chemoradiotherapy were independently associated with longer event-free survival (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR), 0.74 [95% CI 0.55-0.99], p = 0.043; aHR, 0.70 [95% CI 0.54-0.91], p = 0.009; aHR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.29-0.55], p < 0.001, respectively) and with longer overall survival (aHR, 0.69 [95% CI 0.49-0.96], p = 0.029; aHR, 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.70], p < 0.001; aHR, 0.58 [95% CI 0.42-0.81], p = 0.002, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation in combination with maximal resection, followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy is safe, efficient, and well-tolerated in newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastomas in adults.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCarmustineCombined Modality TherapyDrug ImplantsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSupratentorial NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCarmustineDrug ImplantsCarmustine waferGlioblastomaKarnofsky performance statusSafety

Identifiers

PMID28669011
OpenAlexW2731219587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.