Trial reportAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2017
Safety and Acceptability of Patient-Administered Sedatives During Mechanical Ventilation.
Trial report in American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of midazolam versus dexmedetomidine in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Dexmedetomidine vs other sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Intensive care medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Nursing interventions to cover patients' basic needs in the intensive care context - A systematic review.Nursing open · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Letting the Patient Decide: A Case Report of Self-Administered Sedation During Mechanical Ventilation.Critical care nurse · 2018Trial
- Patient Performance of Care Tasks During Acute Hospitalisation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Therapeutic alternatives and strategies for drug conservation in the intensive care unit during times of drug shortage: a report of the Ontario COVID-19 ICU Drug Task Force.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2020Article
- Safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled anxiolysis with dexmedetomidine for burn-care dressing changes: an open-label, single-arm, pilot study.International journal of burns and trauma · 2020Article
- Dexmedetomidine Improves Cardiovascular and Ventilatory Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: Basic and Clinical Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- "Sedation is tricky": A qualitative content analysis of nurses' perceptions of sedation administration in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2018Article
- A Novel Research Method for Determining Sedative Exposure in Critically Ill Patients.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSafety and acceptability of sedative self-administration by patients receiving mechanical ventilation is unknown.
objectivesTo determine if self-administration of dexmedetomidine by patients is safe and acceptable for self-management of anxiety during ventilatory support.
methodsIn a pilot trial in 3 intensive care units, 17 intubated patients were randomly assigned to dexmedetomidine and 20 to usual care. Dexmedetomidine was administered via standard pumps for patient-controlled analgesia, with a basal infusion (0.1-0.7 μg/kg per hour) titrated by the number of patient-triggered doses (0.25 μg/kg per dose). Safety goals were heart rate greater than 40/min, systolic blood pressure greater than 80 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure greater than 50 mm Hg. Acceptability was based on patients' self-reported satisfaction and ability to administer the sedative. A 100-mm visual analog scale was used daily to assess patients' anxiety.
resultsThe sample was 59% male and 89% white. Mean values were age, 50.6 years; score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, 60.1; and protocol duration, 3.4 days. Five dexmedetomidine patients had blood pressure and/or heart rate lower than safety parameters, necessitating short-term treatment. Nurses' adherence to reporting of safety parameters was 100%; adherence to the dexmedetomidine titration algorithm was 73%. Overall baseline anxiety score was 38.4 and did not change significantly (β
conclusionsFor select patients, self-administration of dexmedetomidine is safe and acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.