ArticleNeuroscience2018
STDP Allows Close-to-Optimal Spatiotemporal Spike Pattern Detection by Single Coincidence Detector Neurons.
Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Difference Neuron-a new spiking neuron model.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- Transient boosting of action potential backpropagation for few-shot temporal pattern learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Synaptic Synchronization-Based Learning of Pattern Separation in Self-Organizing Probabilistic Spiking Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Incremental self-organization of spatio-temporal spike pattern detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Selective consistency of recurrent neural networks induced by plasticity as a mechanism of unsupervised perceptual learning.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Synaptic self-organization of spatio-temporal pattern selectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Analyzing time-to-first-spike coding schemes: A theoretical approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Using a Low-Power Spiking Continuous Time Neuron (SCTN) for Sound Signal Processing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Spiking time-dependent plasticity leads to efficient coding of predictions.Biological cybernetics · 2020Article
- Regularity is not a key factor for encoding repetition in rapid image streams.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- A Neuro-Inspired System for Online Learning and Recognition of Parallel Spike Trains, Based on Spike Latency, and Heterosynaptic STDP.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Optimal Localist and Distributed Coding of Spatiotemporal Spike Patterns Through STDP and Coincidence Detection.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Repeating spatiotemporal spike patterns exist and carry information. How this information is extracted by downstream neurons is unclear. Here we theoretically investigate to what extent a single cell could detect a given spike pattern and what the optimal parameters to do so are, in particular the membrane time constant τ. Using a leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron with homogeneous Poisson input, we computed this optimum analytically. We found that a relatively small τ (at most a few tens of ms) is usually optimal, even when the pattern is much longer. This is somewhat counter-intuitive as the resulting detector ignores most of the pattern, due to its fast memory decay. Next, we wondered if spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) could enable a neuron to reach the theoretical optimum. We simulated a LIF equipped with additive STDP, and repeatedly exposed it to a given input spike pattern. As in previous studies, the LIF progressively became selective to the repeating pattern with no supervision, even when the pattern was embedded in Poisson activity. Here we show that, using certain STDP parameters, the resulting pattern detector is optimal. These mechanisms may explain how humans learn repeating sensory sequences. Long sequences could be recognized thanks to coincidence detectors working at a much shorter timescale. This is consistent with the fact that recognition is still possible if a sound sequence is compressed, played backward, or scrambled using 10-ms bins. Coincidence detection is a simple yet powerful mechanism, which could be the main function of neurons in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.