Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28668483›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2018

Advances in keratinocyte delivery in burn wound care.

Britt Ter Horst, Gurpreet Chouhan, Naiem S Moiemen, Liam M Grover

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fibroblasts in Scar Formation: Biology and Clinical Translation.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review of the 100 Most Cited Articles inEuropean burn journal · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Britt Ter HorstSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom; University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Burns Centre, Mindelsohn Way, B15 2TH Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Gurpreet ChouhanSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Naiem S MoiemenUniversity Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Burns Centre, Mindelsohn Way, B15 2TH Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Liam M GroverSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: L.M.Grover@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review gives an updated overview on keratinocyte transplantation in burn wounds concentrating on application methods and future therapeutic cell delivery options with a special interest in hydrogels and spray devices for cell delivery. To achieve faster re-epithelialisation of burn wounds, the original autologous keratinocyte culture and transplantation technique was introduced over 3 decades ago. Application types of keratinocytes transplantation have improved from cell sheets to single-cell solutions delivered with a spray system. However, further enhancement of cell culture, cell viability and function in vivo, cell carrier and cell delivery systems remain themes of interest. Hydrogels such as chitosan, alginate, fibrin and collagen are frequently used in burn wound care and have advantageous characteristics as cell carriers. Future approaches of keratinocyte transplantation involve spray devices, but optimisation of application technique and carrier type is necessary.

Indexed as

Wound HealingBurnsHumansKeratinocytesBurn injuryCell transplantationHydrogelsSpray applicationWound healing

Identifiers

PMID28668483
PMCPMC5764224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.