Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28668267›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017

Measurement of phase resetting curves using optogenetic barrage stimuli.

Matthew H Higgs, Charles J Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew H HiggsThe University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, BSB 1.03.14, San Antonio, TX 78249, United States. Electronic address: matthew.higgs@utsa.edu.
Charles J WilsonThe University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, BSB 1.03.14, San Antonio, TX 78249, United States. Electronic address: charles.wilson@utsa.edu.
The University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC CONTROLOF PALLIDAL ACTIVITYP50NS047085 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SURMEIER, DALTON JAMES · 2003 to 2018
$19.2M
Oscillations and Resonance in Basal Ganglia CircuitsR35NS097185 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI WILSON, CHARLES J · 2017 to 2024
$5.3M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS047085NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phase resetting curve (PRC) is a primary measure of a rhythmically firing neuron's responses to synaptic input, quantifying the change in phase of the firing oscillation as a function of the input phase. PRCs provide information about whether neurons will synchronize due to synaptic coupling or shared input. However, PRC estimation has been limited to in vitro preparations where stable intracellular recordings can be obtained and background activity is minimal, and new methods are required for in vivo applications. NEW

methodWe estimated PRCs using dense optogenetic stimuli and extracellular spike recording. Autonomously firing neurons in substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) of Thy1-channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2) transgenic mice were stimulated with random barrages of light pulses, and PRCs were determined using multiple linear regression.

resultsThe PRCs obtained were type-I, showing only phase advances in response to depolarizing input, and generally sloped upward from early to late phases. Secondary PRCs, indicating the effect on the subsequent ISI, showed phase delays primarily for stimuli arriving at late phases. Phase models constructed from the optogenetic PRCs accounted for a large fraction of the variance in ISI length and provided a good approximation of the spike-triggered average stimulus. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsCompared to methods based on intracellular current injection, the new method sacrifices some temporal resolution. However, it should be much more widely applicable in vivo, because only extracellular recording and optogenetic stimulation are required.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate PRC estimation using methods suitable for in vivo applications.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsChannelrhodopsinsLinear ModelsMice, TransgenicNeuronsOptogeneticsPars CompactaPhotic StimulationThy-1 AntigensTissue Culture TechniquesChannelrhodopsinsThy-1 AntigensExtracellular recordingOptogeneticsPhase resetting curveSubstantia nigra

Identifiers

PMID28668267
PMCPMC5582012
OpenAlexW2725014045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.