Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28668129›Full record

ReviewMethods in enzymology2017

What Combined Measurements From Structures and Imaging Tell Us About DNA Damage Responses.

Chris A Brosey, Zamal Ahmed, Susan P Lees-Miller, John A Tainer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in enzymology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris A BroseyThe University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Zamal AhmedThe University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Susan P Lees-MillerRobson DNA Science Centre, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Electronic address: leesmill@ucalgary.ca.
John A TainerThe University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States. Electronic address: jtainer@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Transcription-Coupled & Replication-Associated Excision RepairP01CA092584 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WALTER J. CHAZIN · 2001 to 2026
$89.6M
CIHR MOP13639NCI NIH HHS P01 CA092584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage outcomes depend upon the efficiency and fidelity of DNA damage responses (DDRs) for different cells and damage. As such, DDRs represent tightly regulated prototypical systems for linking nanoscale biomolecular structure and assembly to the biology of genomic regulation and cell signaling. However, the dynamic and multifunctional nature of DDR assemblies can render elusive the correlation between the structures of DDR factors and specific biological disruptions to the DDR when these structures are altered. In this chapter, we discuss concepts and strategies for combining structural, biophysical, and imaging techniques to investigate DDR recognition and regulation, and thus bridge sequence-level structural biochemistry to quantitative biological outcomes visualized in cells. We focus on representative DDR responses from PARP/PARG/AIF damage signaling in DNA single-strand break repair and nonhomologous end joining complexes in double-strand break repair. Methods with exemplary experimental results are considered with a focus on strategies for probing flexibility, conformational changes, and assembly processes that shape a predictive understanding of DDR mechanisms in a cellular context. Integration of structural and imaging measurements promises to provide foundational knowledge to rationally control and optimize DNA damage outcomes for synthetic lethality and for immune activation with resulting insights for biology and cancer interventions.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairSignal TransductionAnimalsApoptosis Inducing FactorCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayDNAGenomic InstabilityGlycoside HydrolasesHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, MolecularNeoplasmsOptical ImagingPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesApoptosis Inducing FactorDNAGlycoside HydrolasesPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesApoptosisCancer GenomeDNA damage responseDNA double-strand breaksExcision repairGenome instabilityHomologous recombinationMolecular mimicryNonhomologous end joiningReplicationSmall-angle X-ray scatteringSuper-resolution imagingTranscription

Identifiers

PMID28668129
PMCPMC5549440
OpenAlexW2620297444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.