ArticleMolecular ecology2017
A genomic investigation of ecological differentiation between free-living and Drosophila-associated bacteria.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Microbiome composition modulates the lethal outcome of Drosophila A virus infection.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- Environment and diet shape the geography-specificApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Commensal acidification of specific gut regions produces a protective priority effect against enteropathogenic bacterial infection.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Leveraging microbial ecology for mosquito-borne disease control.Trends in parasitology · 2025Review
- Microbial solutions to dietary stress: experimental evolution reveals host-microbiome interplay inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- MosAIC: An annotated collection of mosquito-associated bacteria with high-quality genome assemblies.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- The impact of altered dietary adenine concentrations on the gut microbiota inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effect of Ciprofloxacin on the Composition of Intestinal Microbiota inMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Microbiota acquisition and transmission iniScience · 2023Article
- Flagellar Genes Are Associated with the Colonization Persistence Phenotype of the Drosophila melanogaster Microbiota.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- A phylogenomic and comparative genomic analysis of Commensalibacter, a versatile insect symbiont.Animal microbiome · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial peptides do not directly contribute to aging in Drosophila, but improve lifespan by preventing dysbiosis.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- How It All Begins: Bacterial Factors Mediating the Colonization of Invertebrate Hosts by Beneficial Symbionts.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- A Functional Analysis of the Purine Salvage Pathway in Acetobacter fabarum.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Nitrogen Acquisition Strategies Mediated by Insect Symbionts: A Review of Their Mechanisms, Methodologies, and Case Studies.Insects · 2022Review
- An altered microbiome in a Parkinson's disease model Drosophila melanogaster has a negative effect on development.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Influence of bacteria on the maintenance of a yeast during Drosophila melanogaster metamorphosis.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Horizontal gene transfer-mediated bacterial strain variation affects host fitness in Drosophila.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Genome-Inferred Correspondence between Phylogeny and Metabolic Traits in the Wild Drosophila Gut Microbiome.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various bacterial taxa have been identified both in association with animals and in the external environment, but the extent to which related bacteria from the two habitat types are ecologically and evolutionarily distinct is largely unknown. This study investigated the scale and pattern of genetic differentiation between bacteria of the family Acetobacteraceae isolated from the guts of Drosophila fruit flies, plant material and industrial fermentations. Genome-scale analysis of the phylogenetic relationships and predicted functions was conducted on 44 Acetobacteraceae isolates, including newly sequenced genomes from 18 isolates from wild and laboratory Drosophila. Isolates from the external environment and Drosophila could not be assigned to distinct phylogenetic groups, nor are their genomes enriched for any different sets of genes or category of predicted gene functions. In contrast, analysis of bacteria from laboratory Drosophila showed they were genetically distinct in their universal capacity to degrade uric acid (a major nitrogenous waste product of Drosophila) and absence of flagellar motility, while these traits vary among wild Drosophila isolates. Analysis of the competitive fitness of Acetobacter discordant for these traits revealed a significant fitness deficit for bacteria that cannot degrade uric acid in culture with Drosophila. We propose that, for wild populations, frequent cycling of Acetobacter between Drosophila and the external environment prevents genetic differentiation by maintaining selection for traits adaptive in both the gut and external habitats. However, laboratory isolates bear the signs of adaptation to persistent association with the Drosophila host under tightly defined environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.