Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667675›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2017

D-512, a novel dopamine D

David Lindenbach, Banibrata Das, Melissa M Conti, Samantha M Meadows, Aloke K Dutta, Christopher Bishop

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. D-512, a novel dopamine DBritish journal of pharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David LindenbachBehavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Binghamton University - State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Banibrata DasDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Melissa M ContiBehavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Binghamton University - State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Samantha M MeadowsBehavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Binghamton University - State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Aloke K DuttaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Christopher BishopBehavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Binghamton University - State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4623-1085
Binghamton University · USEugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · US

Funding

Novel Neuroprotective Treatment for Parkinson's DiseaseR01NS047198 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DUTTA, ALOKE K · 2005 to 2015
$3.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSymptoms of Parkinson's disease are commonly managed using selective dopamine D EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A rat model of Parkinson's disease was created by unilaterally infusing 6-hydroxydopamine, a dopamine neurotoxin, into the medial forebrain bundle. D-512 was compared with ropinirole for ability to stimulate spontaneous motor activity and reverse Parkinsonian akinesia. These beneficial effects were compared against each drug's liability to provoke dyskinesia, a common motor side effect. KEY

resultsBoth compounds increased spontaneous movement, but D-512 showed a longer duration of action. Only D-512 was able to significantly reverse forelimb akinesia. Drug-induced dyskinesia was similar for equivalent doses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Compared with ropinirole, D-512 showed greater peak-dose efficacy and a longer duration of action, despite a similar side-effect profile. Our results add to earlier data showing that D-512 is superior to available D

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiparkinson AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDopamine AgonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugIndolesMaleMolecular StructureParkinson DiseaseRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3Structure-Activity RelationshipThiazolesAntiparkinson AgentsD-512 compoundDopamine AgonistsIndolesReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3ropiniroleThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID28667675
PMCPMC5573415
OpenAlexW2725697445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.