Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667568›Full record

SynthesisJournal of genetic counseling2017

Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Alison L Young, Phyllis N Butow, Janine Vetsch, Veronica F Quinn, Andrea F Patenaude, Katherine M Tucker, Claire E Wakefield

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison L YoungSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. ayou1666@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Phyllis N ButowSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Janine VetschBehavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Level 1 South, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Veronica F QuinnBehavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Level 1 South, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Andrea F PatenaudeDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine M TuckerHereditary Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
Claire E WakefieldBehavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Level 1 South, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USPrince of Wales Hospital · AUSydney Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding challenges in familial communication of cancer risk has informed genetic service delivery. Parent-child interactions have received considerable attention, but few studies focus on young adulthood experiences within BRCA1/2 families. Young adults are approaching, or at a life stage where awareness of hereditary cancer risk is vital for informed choice of risk management options. This review assesses family communication, risk perception and cancer knowledge held by 18-40 year old individuals who have a parent with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation or carry the gene mutation themselves. Thirteen papers met the inclusion criteria. One utilized a 'mixed methods' methodology and the remaining used a qualitative approach. Findings were synthesized into themes and reported narratively. In general, parents are communicating openly about genetic risk with young adult offspring, but there is evidence that some young adults are withholding information from their parents about their own test results. Risk perception is influenced by a family history of cancer, childbearing plans and health providers' advice. Misconceptions about genetic risk appear to be common and gaps in hereditary cancer knowledge are evident. It is unclear whether incorrect knowledge was passed from parents to offspring. Health providers need to provide developmentally appropriate services for emerging adults (18-25 years old), with particular support in navigating through risk management options.

Indexed as

Adult ChildrenGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Parent-Child RelationsAdultFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMutationNeoplasmsYoung AdultBRCA mutationCancer knowledgeEmerging adultFamily communicationRisk perceptionSystematic reviewYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID28667568
OpenAlexW2728945228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.