ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2017
Dissection of Cervical and Cerebral Arteries.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Unusual Catastrophic Neurological Complication Following a Routine Arthroscopic Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Transoral ultrasound for bedside diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection in ICU patients with limited cervical access: a case report.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Sonographic features associated with ischemic stroke in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection: a single-center exploratory study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Safety of Physical Activity After Cervical Artery Dissection.European journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Thrombectomy with and without emergent stenting in acute ischemic stroke due to carotid artery dissection.European stroke journal · 2026Observational
- Long-term mental health and quality of life in patients after cervical artery dissection.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Hybrid retrograde transcarotid stenting for common carotid artery dissection secondary to acute type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A Visualized Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Acute Ischemic Stroke Among Patients With Cervical Artery Dissection.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Middle cerebral artery dissection: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic options.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Understanding Headaches Attributed to Cranial and/or Cervical Vascular Disorders: Insights and Challenges for Neurologists.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- A Pediatric Case of Middle Cerebral Artery Dissection With Delayed Morphological Changes.Cureus · 2024Article
- The association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulation among US adults.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Article
- Unraveling the Links between Chronic Inflammation, Autoimmunity, and Spontaneous Cervicocranial Arterial Dissection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulative therapy -a medicare claims analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- "Incidence, characteristics and prognosis of cervical artery dissection-induced ischemic stroke in central Iran".BMC neurology · 2022Observational
- Multiple Arterial Dissections and Connective Tissue Abnormalities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Association between carotid artery dissection and vascular tortuosity: a case-control study.Neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Treated with C-Guard Stent.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2022Article
- Postpartum Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Secondary to Vertebral Artery Dissection. Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2021Article
- Cervical and intracranial artery dissections.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe aimed to summarize recent findings in cervical (CeAD) and intracranial artery dissection (IAD) research. RECENT
findingsConsidered a disease of the young- and middle-aged, an analysis on the largest CeAD-population to date (n = 2391) revealed that about 1 of 14 CeAD-patients was aged ≥60 years. Distinct genetic variants were associated with CeAD. However, in clinical practice, genetic investigations are not helpful due to the small effect size. Despite the paucity of data from randomized-controlled trials in CeAD-stroke patients, both intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment should be considered as acute treatment in such patients. Future research is needed to clarify which patients benefit most from each treatment modality. Whether to use antiplatelets or anticoagulants in stroke prevention in CeAD-patients is still a matter of debate. One randomized-controlled feasibility trial has been published, and another trial designed to show non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin-K-antagonists is underway and will be terminated in late 2018. Non-vitamin-K-oral anticoagulants should not be used in CeAD outside a properly designed trial, as experience with these drugs in CeAD-patients is limited. With many IAD patients developing intracranial hemorrhage, antithrombotic therapy should be used with caution. Knowledge about CeAD and IAD has advanced substantially. Nevertheless, further research is mandatory, in particular regarding pathophysiology, acute treatment, and stroke-preventive therapy, as well as long-term outcome and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.