Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667368›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017

[Puberty is a major factor in pilonidal sinus disease : Gender-specific investigations of case number development in Germany from 2007 until 2015].

M Ardelt, U Dennler, R Fahrner, G Hallof, H-M Tautenhahn, F Dondorf, F Rauchfuss, U Settmacher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M ArdeltKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. Michael.ardelt@med.uni-jena.de.
U DennlerGeschäftsbereich Medizincontrolling, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Deutschland.
R FahrnerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
G HallofKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
H-M TautenhahnKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
F DondorfKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
F RauchfussKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
U SettmacherKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
Jena University Hospital · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPilonidal sinus disease is an acute abscess-forming or chronic subacute inflammation, characterized by a fistula system with typical ostia. Treatment is primarily surgical.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate and evaluate the evolution of pilonidal sinus disease in Germany on the basis of data provided by the Federal Statistical Office in Germany (Statistisches Bundesamt). MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom the diagnosis data of hospital inpatients generated by the Federal Statistical Office in Germany the data on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code L05 for pilonidal sinus from 2007 to 2015 were extracted and processed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The number of cases increased from 25,835 cases in 2007 to 31,033 cases in 2011, followed by a decrease to 30,235 cases in 2015. Considering the number of patients under 20 years of age, there was also an increase from 40 cases per 100,000 population in 2007 to 50 cases per 100,000 population in 2013. Ever since, the case numbers have remained relatively constant and have reached a plateau. The maximum number of case numbers was in the age group of 20-24 years. The female age group 10-14 years old is the only group among all investigated age groups with more cases than the respective male age group. The investigated data did not permit any epidemiological conclusions for pilonidal sinus disease because outpatient cases have not been included. The higher incidence in the female age group 10-14 years old could be explained by the earlier onset of adolescence. Thus, adolescence appears to have a major impact on the development of pilonidal sinus disease.

Indexed as

PubertyAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMalePilonidal SinusRisk FactorsSex FactorsYoung AdultAetiologyPilonidal sinus diseaseSaccrococcygeal pilonidal sinusSinus pilonidalis

Identifiers

PMID28667368
OpenAlexW2727219115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.