Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2018
The use of handheld nasal spirometry to predict the presence of obstructive sleep apnea.
Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNasal obstruction and oral breathing may play an important role in the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aims to better understand the link between oral breathing, nasal obstruction, and the spectrum of sleep-disordered breathing. STUDY
designProspective study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prospective study of patients who presented to the Otolaryngology clinic and underwent polysomnogram (PSG) from 2015 to 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of their OSA as defined by PSG results. Both apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and supine and REM AHI (SUP-REMe AHI), a parameter that takes into account both sleep position and sleep stage, were recorded. The primary outcome was awake nasal-oral forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1) ratio as measured by handheld spirometry.
resultsA total of 21 patients were included in the study. We found that nasal-oral FEV1 ratio was significantly different between patients with minimal and substantial OSA as stratified by SUP-REMe AHI, while not significant when stratified by AHI.
conclusionPatients with substantial OSA as determined by SUP-REMe AHI are more likely to have decreased awake nasal airflow as measured by nasal-oral FEV1. SUP-REMe AHI may represent an improved metric of OSA severity by taking into account sleep position and sleep stage. Handheld spirometers have the potential to become an important office tool by allowing for easy and reliable measurement of nasal airflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.