Trial reportBMJ open2017
PATHway I: design and rationale for the investigation of the feasibility, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a technology-enabled cardiac rehabilitation platform.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02717806 (Technology-enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Through PATHway. Feasibility, Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Technology-enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Through PATHway. Feasibility, Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Toward a Digital Platform for the Self-Management of Noncommunicable Disease: Systematic Review of Platform-Like Interventions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions to promote patient utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2018Pooled it
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Effectiveness of a Technology-Enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Platform (Physical Activity Toward Health-I): Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Two-Arm Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Meta-Analysis of N-of-1 Studies: Comparison of Statistical Efficiency in Determining an Intervention Effect.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
- Methods for assessing exercise fidelity in unsupervised home-based cardiovascular rehabilitation: a scoping review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Tele-Exercise for Fitness: Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Athletes and Non-Athletes' Trainees.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Emerging Technologies and Open-Source Platforms for Remote Physical Exercise: Innovations and Opportunities for Healthy Population-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exercise, prescription and training in ACHD.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023Review
- Physical Therapy Programs in Older Adults with Coronary Artery Disease: Preferences to Technology-Based Cardiac Physical Therapy Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Applications of Machine Learning in Real-Life Digital Health Interventions: Review of the Literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Review
- User Models for Personalized Physical Activity Interventions: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- An evaluation of an intervention designed to help inactive adults become more active with a peer mentoring component: a protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility trial of the Move for Life programme.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2019Article
- Safety and long-term outcomes of remote cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) independently alters the clinical course of cardiovascular diseases resulting in a significant reduction in all-cause and cardiac mortality. However, only 15%-30% of all eligible patients participate in a phase 2 ambulatory programme. The uptake rate of community-based programmes following phase 2 CR and adherence to long-term exercise is extremely poor. Newer care models, involving telerehabilitation programmes that are delivered remotely, show considerable promise for increasing adherence. In this view, the PATHway (Physical Activity Towards Health) platform was developed and now needs to be evaluated in terms of its feasibility and clinical efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial, 120 participants (m/f, age 40-80 years) completing a phase 2 ambulatory CR programme will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to PATHway or usual care. PATHway involves a comprehensive, internet-enabled, sensor-based home CR platform and provides individualised heart rate monitored exercise programmes (exerclasses and exergames) as the basis on which to provide a personalised lifestyle intervention programme. The control group will receive usual care. Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after completion of phase 2 of the CR programme. The primary outcome is the change in active energy expenditure. Secondary outcomes include cardiopulmonary endurance capacity, muscle strength, body composition, cardiovascular risk factors, peripheral endothelial vascular function, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), well-being, mediators of behaviour change and safety. HRQoL and healthcare costs will be taken into account in cost-effectiveness evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This protocol has been approved by the director and clinical director of the PATHway study and by the ethical committee of each participating site. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at congresses and events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02717806. This trial is currently in the pre-results stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.