Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667225›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care and safety in the management of patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney disease (PRO-trACK project): a mixed-methods project protocol.

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Derek Kyte, Paul Cockwell, Tom Marshall, Mary Dutton, Anita Slade, Neil Marklew, Gary Price, Rav Verdi, Judi Waters and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Olalekan Lee AiyegbusiCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Derek KyteCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul CockwellCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tom MarshallCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mary DuttonDepartment of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anita SladeCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Neil MarklewPatient Advisory Group Member, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gary PricePatient Advisory Group Member, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rav VerdiPatient Advisory Group Member, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Judi WatersPatient Advisory Group Member, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Keeley SharpePatient Advisory Group Member, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Melanie CalvertCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2016-09-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a major effect on the quality of life and health status of patients and requires accurate and responsive management. The use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) could assist patients with advanced pre-dialysis CKD, and the clinicians responsible for their care, by identifying important changes in symptom burden in real time. We report the protocol for 'Using Patient-Reported Outcome measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care and safety in the management of patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease' (PRO-trACK) project, which will explore the feasibility and validity of an ePROM system for use in patients with advanced CKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project will use a mixed-methods approach in three studies: (1) usability testing of the ePROM system involving up to 30 patients and focusing on acceptability and technical performance/stability; (2) ascertaining the views of patient and clinician stakeholders on the optimal use and administration of the CKD ePROM system-this will involve qualitative face-to-face/telephone interviewing with up to 30 patients or until saturation is achieved, focus groups with up to 15 clinical staff, management and IT team members; (3) psychometric assessment of the system, within a cohort of at least 180 patients with advanced CKD, to establish the measurement properties of the ePROM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project was approved by the West Midlands Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee (Reference 17/WM/0010) and received Health Research Authority (HRA) approval on 24 February 2017.The findings from this project will be provided to clinicians at the Department of Renal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospitals, Birmingham (QEHB), NHS England, presented at conferences and to the Kidney Patients' Association, British Kidney Patient Association and the British Renal Society. Articles based on the findings will be written and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeFeasibility StudiesHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchRenal Insufficiency, ChronicResearch Designnephrologyqualitative researchstatistics&research methodsusability testing

Identifiers

PMID28667225
PMCPMC5726096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.