Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667217›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2017

What techniques might be used to harness placebo effects in non-malignant pain? A literature review and survey to develop a taxonomy.

Felicity L Bishop, Beverly Coghlan, Adam Wa Geraghty, Hazel Everitt, Paul Little, Michelle M Holmes, Dionysis Seretis, George Lewith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing placebo: Lessons from psychedelic science.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Clinical Use of Biologics in the Knee Lesions: Does the Patient Benefit?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2019
    Review
  14. Optimizing ExpectationsFrontiers in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicity L BishopDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Human and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-6662
Beverly CoghlanPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Adam Wa GeraghtyPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Hazel EverittPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michelle M HolmesDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Human and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Dionysis SeretisDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Human and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
George LewithPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Primary Health Care · QAUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPlacebo effects can be clinically meaningful but are seldom fully exploited in clinical practice. This review aimed to facilitate translational research by producing a taxonomy of techniques that could augment placebo analgesia in clinical practice.

designLiterature review and survey.

methodsWe systematically analysed methods which could plausibly be used to elicit placebo effects in 169 clinical and laboratory-based studies involving non-malignant pain, drawn from seven systematic reviews. In a validation exercise, we surveyed 33 leading placebo researchers (mean 12 years’ research experience, SD 9.8), who were asked to comment on and add to the draft taxonomy derived from the literature.

resultsThe final taxonomy defines 30 procedures that may contribute to placebo effects in clinical and experimental research, proposes 60 possible clinical applications and classifies procedures into five domains: the patient’s characteristics and belief (5 procedures and 11 clinical applications), the practitioner’s characteristics and beliefs (2 procedures and 4 clinical applications), the healthcare setting (8 procedures and 13 clinical applications), treatment characteristics (8 procedures and 14 clinical applications) and the patientâ€"practitioner interaction (7 procedures and 18 clinical applications).

conclusionThe taxonomy provides a preliminary and novel tool with potential to guide translational research aiming to harness placebo effects for patient benefit in practice.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPainTranslational Research, Biomedicalclassificationnocebo effectplacebo effectplacebosreviewtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID28667217
PMCPMC5734496
OpenAlexW2735786535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.