Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667197›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Developing patient education to enhance recovery after colorectal surgery through action research: a qualitative study.

Fiona Poland, Nicola Spalding, Sheila Gregory, Jane McCulloch, Kevin Sargen, Penny Vicary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery: randomized feasibility trial and efficacy assessment (IDEAL Stage 2B).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A qualitative exploration of patient perspectives regarding patient education during their colorectal surgical experience.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  10. Challenges of Care Transition From Hospital to Home for Older Colorectal Surgery Patients: Surgeons' Perspectives.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nurse-led Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: Potential Solution to Shorten Postoperative Recovery.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Improving recovery after bowel cancer surgery: mixed methods feasibility study of a co-produced information intervention (Recover Together).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fiona PolandSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Nicola SpaldingSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Sheila GregorySchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Jane McCullochNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Kevin SargenChesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield, Calow, Derbyshire, UK.
Penny VicarySchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand the role of preoperative education for patients undergoing colorectal surgery by involving patients, carers and staff in: (1) identifying its perceived value and deficits for enhanced recovery; (2) modifying current education practices to address educational deficits; and (3) evaluating these changes for preparing patients to enhance their recovery.

designQualitative study of three cycles of action research using mixed methods within a 24-month naturalistic enquiry to identify, implement and evaluate changes through observations, questionnaires, semistructured longitudinal interviews, focus groups and documentation review.

settingA UK 1200-bed National Health Service (NHS) hospital providing colorectal surgery in a small city in a rural county.

participantsNinety-sevenpatients having colorectal surgery, 19 carers and 22 clinical staff.

resultsThemes identified were: (1) knowledge and engagement; (2) situated understanding and confidence building; and (3) partnership and proactive involvement in enhancing recovery. All patients articulated needs to prepare mentally and physically to plan for colorectal surgery and rehabilitation. Patients and carers wanted to counter uncertainty about medical procedures: likely bodily changes, recovery timescales and future. They therefore sought as much personalised, relevant information as possible about their disease, planned surgery and recovery. Staff implemented preoperative education to more specifically inform and respond multimodally to individual needs.

conclusionsPatients wanted to be proactively involved in managing their recovery to re-engage with their everyday lives. Preoperative education supported this through developing patients' situated understanding of hospital and bodily processes related to colorectal surgery. Situated understanding was achieved through educational product to give knowledge and processes promoting engagement. Multimodal, comprehensive and timely preoperative education on the whole patient pathway facilitates active engagement. Situated understanding increased patients' confidence to work in partnership with healthcare professionals and proactively self-manage recovery.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicPreoperative PeriodRecovery of FunctionColorectal NeoplasmsFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHealth Services ResearchHumansPatient ParticipationProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairescolorectal surgeryEducation & Training (see Medical Education & Training)qualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28667197
PMCPMC5577868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.