Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28667173›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

A time for promiscuity in a eukaryotic recombinase.

Maria Spies

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria SpiesFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 maria-spies@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Regulation of unwinding and remodeling activities in FeS-DNA helicasesR01GM108617 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SPIES, MARIA · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exchange of DNA strands between broken and intact molecules lies at the heart of fundamental cellular processes ranging from repairing DNA damage by homologous recombination to generation of genetic diversity during sexual reproduction. New work by Lee and colleagues utilizes the DNA curtain method, an elegant single-molecule technique, to demonstrate common and idiosyncratic features in the DNA strand exchange mechanisms of three RecA-family recombinases, bacterial RecA, and eukaryotic Rad51 and Dmc1 proteins.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairRad51 RecombinaseRec A RecombinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDMC1 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsRAD51 protein, S cerevisiaeRad51 RecombinaseRec A RecombinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28667173
PMCPMC5491794
OpenAlexW2726949306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.