Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28666955›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2017

Dnases in health and disease.

Peter A Keyel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of Patients With Beta-Lactams Positive Provocation Tests by Biomarkers of IgG-Related Neutrophil Activation.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A MgBMC genomics · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Sepsis-induced NET formation requires MYD88 but is independent of GSDMD and PAD4.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter A KeyelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, United States. Electronic address: peter.keyel@ttu.edu.
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 16SDG30200001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA degradation is critical to healthy organism development and survival. Two nuclease families that play key roles in development and in disease are the Dnase1 and Dnase2 families. While these two families were initially characterized by biochemical function, it is now clear that multiple enzymes in each family perform similar, non-redundant roles in many different tissues. Most Dnase1 and Dnase2 family members are poorly characterized, yet their elimination can lead to a wide range of diseases, including lethal anemia, parakeratosis, cataracts and systemic lupus erythematosus. Therefore, understanding these enzyme families represents a critical field of emerging research. This review explores what is currently known about Dnase1 and Dnase2 family members, highlighting important questions about the structure and function of family members, and how their absence translates to disease.

Indexed as

DiseaseHealthAnimalsDeoxyribonucleasesHumansOrgan SpecificityDeoxyribonucleasesApoptosisDevelopmentLupusNuclease

Identifiers

PMID28666955
PMCPMC11492367
OpenAlexW2727136251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.