Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28666548›Full record

ReviewGeriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)

Evaluation of fatigability measurement: Integrative review.

Inah Kim, Eileen Hacker, Carol Estwing Ferrans, Craig Horswill, Chang Park, Mary Kapella

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03800342 (Recovery, Fatigability, and Proteomic Response to Aerobic Exercise Training in Healthy Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03800342 nacompletednot on this map

Recovery, Fatigability, and Proteomic Response to Aerobic Exercise Training in Healthy Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Mason UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled21ConditionsAdult, FatigueArmsAerobic Exercise Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating Test-Retest Reliability of Fatigability in Chronic Stroke.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Measures of excessPilot and feasibility studies · 2021
    Article
  13. Aerobic capacity and fatigability are associated with activity levels in women with hip osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fatigability: A Prognostic Indicator of Phenotypic Aging.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Epidemiology of Perceived Physical Fatigability in Older Adults: The Long Life Family Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inah KimCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA. Electronic address: ikim33@uic.edu.
Eileen HackerSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, USA.
Carol Estwing FerransCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Craig HorswillKinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Chang ParkCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Mary KapellaCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.

Funding

Efficacy and mechanisms of a behavioral therapy for insomnia coexisting with COPDR01NR013937 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KAPELLA, MARY C · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatigability is defined as the extent of fatigue in the context of activity and differs from the term used in exercise literature to describe muscle endurance characteristics. Many fatigability measures are available, but no studies have thoroughly evaluated them for adequate incorporation of fatigability concepts. This integrative review provides an overall assessment of existing fatigability measures and then evaluates each in depth. A database search and hand search produced 14 studies for review. Fatigability measurement took three forms: self-reported fatigability, perceived fatigability (self-reported fatigue following a defined performance test), and performance fatigability (performance deterioration). Of 17 measures identified, validity and/or reliability was reported for six (35.3%), and no measure was used in more than one study. Fatigability measures have been correlated with clinical measures, indicating that fatigability should be measured during routine clinical health screening. Refinement of measures and additional fatigability data collection will improve understanding and treatment of fatigue.

Indexed as

ExerciseFatigueGeriatric AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedHumansSelf ReportFatigabilityFatiguePhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID28666548
PMCPMC6873705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.