Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28666422›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

The role of hormonal therapy in patients with relapsed high-grade ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective series of tamoxifen and letrozole.

Angela George, Jennifer McLachlan, Nina Tunariu, Chiara Della Pepa, Cristina Migali, Martin Gore, Stan Kaye, Susana Banerjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela GeorgeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Jennifer McLachlanThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Nina TunariuRadiology Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Chiara Della PepaThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Cristina MigaliThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Martin GoreThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Stan KayeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Susana BanerjeeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. Susana.banerjee@rmh.nhs.uk.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHormonal therapy is used as a treatment option in high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC), but the role and choice of treatment remains unclear. Agents used include tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen (T) and letrozole (L) in HGOC in clinical practice and investigate factors influencing clinical outcome.

methodsA retrospective review of patients with relapsed HGOC treated with either tamoxifen or letrozole at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 2007 and 2012 was performed. The primary endpoint of the study was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included CA125 response, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and duration of response. Platinum-sensitivity and ER-status were evaluated as predictors of treatment response.

results97 patients were included (43 T, 54 L); median age 63 years (20-92); 91% high-grade serous; median number of lines of prior chemotherapy 3 (1-8); 60% platinum-resistant, 40% platinum-sensitive; 52% ER + ve, 1% ER-ve, 47% unknown. 14 patients (6 T, 8 L) achieved a partial response, with ORR (RECIST) of 14% (T) and 15% (L). The CBR for ≥3 months was 65% (22/43) for tamoxifen and 56% (22/54) for letrozole. There was no significant difference in ORR (p = 0.99) or CBR (p = 0.14) between tamoxifen and letrozole. 22 patients (23%) had a CA-125 response with hormonal therapy (10 T - 23% and 12 L - 22%). ORR did not differ by platinum sensitivity (p = 0.42); or ER-status (positive vs unknown, p = 0.12). Responders to letrozole had longer durations of response than responders to tamoxifen (26 vs 11.5 months, p = 0.03), but equivalent disease stability duration (9.6 vs 7.2 months respectively, p = 0.11).

conclusionsWithin the constraints of a retrospective study, we identified that patients treated with letrozole had a significantly longer duration of response than those treated with tamoxifen. Treatment with either tamoxifen or letrozole is a rational treatment option for patients with ER + ve HGOC, with equivalent ORR, CBR and disease stability.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaFemaleHumansLetrozoleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNitrilesOvarian NeoplasmsReceptors, EstrogenRecurrenceAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorLetrozoleNitrilesReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenTriazolesEndocrine therapyHormonal therapyLetrozoleOvarian cancerTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID28666422
PMCPMC5493843
OpenAlexW2731305766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.