ArticleNeuro-oncology2017
Cost-effectiveness of radiation and chemotherapy for high-risk low-grade glioma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of hypoxia-related molecular clusters and prognostic riskScore for glioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 pharmacotherapies for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA and China.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- High costs, low quality of life, reduced survival, and room for improving treatment: an analysis of burden and unmet needs in glioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Long-Term Tumor Control Following Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT) of Low-Grade Gliomas (LGGs): A New Treatment Paradigm?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ofAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Cost Matrix of Molecular Pathology in Glioma-Towards AI-Driven Rational Molecular Testing and Precision Care for the Future.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Brain Tumor Infodemiology: Worldwide Online Health-Seeking Behavior Using Google Trends and Wikipedia Pageviews.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Short-Course Radiation Plus Temozolomide for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Among Elderly Patients in China and the United States.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Neuro-oncology in the Philippines: a scoping review on the state of medical practice, deterrents to care and therapeutic gaps.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021Article
- Advances in radiotherapy and comprehensive treatment of high-grade glioma: immunotherapy and tumor-treating fields.Journal of Cancer · 2021Review
- Prospects of biological and synthetic pharmacotherapies for glioblastoma.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe addition of procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) for patients with high-risk (≥40 y old or subtotally resected) low-grade glioma (LGG) results in an absolute median survival benefit of over 5 years. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of this treatment strategy.
methodsA decision tree with an integrated 3-state Markov model was created to follow patients with high-risk LGG after surgery treated with RT versus RT+PCV. Patients existed in one of 3 health states: stable, progressive, or dead. Survival and freedom from progression were modeled to reflect the results of RTOG 9802 using time-dependent transition probabilities. Health utility values and costs of care were derived from the literature and national registry databases. Analysis was conducted from the health care perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis explored uncertainty in model parameters.
resultsModeled outcomes demonstrated agreement with clinical data in expected benefit of addition of PCV to RT. The addition of PCV to RT yielded an incremental benefit of 4.77 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (9.94 for RT+PCV vs 5.17 for RT alone) at an incremental cost of $48635 ($188234 for RT+PCV vs $139598 for RT alone), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10186 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrates that within modeled distributions of parameters, RT+PCV has 99.96% probability of being cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100000 per QALY.
conclusionThe addition of PCV to RT is a cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with high-risk LGG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.