Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28666187›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2017

Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of RANK, OPG, and RANKL mRNA Expression in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Anthracycline-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Eleni Timotheadou, Konstantine T Kalogeras, Georgia-Angeliki Koliou, Ralph M Wirtz, Flora Zagouri, Angelos Koutras, Elke Veltrup, Christos Christodoulou, George Pentheroudakis, Aris Tsiftsoglou and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The RANK-RANKL axis: an opportunity for drug repurposing in cancer?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Eleni TimotheadouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantine T KalogerasLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Translational Research Section, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Athens, Greece.
Georgia-Angeliki KoliouSection of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens, Greece.
Ralph M WirtzSTRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Flora ZagouriDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Angelos KoutrasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece.
Elke VeltrupSTRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Christos ChristodoulouSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
George PentheroudakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
Aris TsiftsoglouDepartment of General Surgery, Breast Division, St Luke's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Pavlos PapakostasOncology Unit, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Gerasimos AravantinosSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Vasilios VenizelosBreast Unit, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Dimitrios PectasidesOncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Paris KosmidisSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Charisios KaranikiotisDepartment of Medical Oncology, 424 Army General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christos MarkopoulosSecond Department of Prop. Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Helen GogasFirst Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
George FountzilasLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: fountzil@auth.gr.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHippocration General Hospital · GRMetropolitan Hospital · GR424 General Military Hospital · GRAlexandra Hospital · GRHellenic Cooperative Oncology Group · GRHospital Agioi Anargyroi · GRHygeia Hospital · GRLaiko General Hospital of Athens · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSt. Luke's Hospital · GRUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevention of bone metastases is a major issue for breast cancer patients, as it would improve quality of life in a population where long survival is anticipated. PATIENTS AND

methodsEarly breast cancer patients, who had been treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy within two randomized trials, were included in the study. We evaluated, by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, 819 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples for mRNA expression of RANK, OPG, and RANKL, as well as their ratios, for potential prognostic significance for the development of bone metastases and also for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival.

resultsMedian age was 52.7years, whereas 54.2% of the patients were postmenopausal and 78.3% estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive. After a median follow-up of 119.9months, 226 patients (27.6%) had died and 291 patients (35.5%) had disease progression. Low mRNA expression of RANKL was associated with postmenopausal status and greater number of positive lymph nodes (P=.002 and P<.001, respectively). In the univariate analysis, low RANKL mRNA expression was found to be an unfavorable factor for DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.68, Wald's P=.018] and bone metastasis-free survival (HR=1.67, 95% CI 1.09-2.56, P=.018), although it did not retain its significance in the multivariate analysis.

conclusionsLow RANKL mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients is of prognostic significance for increased risk for relapse and bone metastases and might potentially guide clinical decision-making for the use of anti-RANKL agents in the treatment of early breast cancer patients at high risk for metastatic spread, provided that our findings are validated in independent cohorts.

Identifiers

PMID28666187
PMCPMC5491451
OpenAlexW2732084179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.