Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28666080›Full record

Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2017

A Phase III Study Evaluating Continuation, Tapering, and Withdrawal of Certolizumab Pegol After One Year of Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Michael E Weinblatt, Clifton O Bingham, Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester, Vivian P Bykerk, Daniel E Furst, Xavier Mariette, Désirée van der Heijde, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Brenda VanLunen, Cécile Ecoffet and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01519791 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Combination With Methotrexate for Inducing and Sustaining Clinical Response in the Treatment of DMARD-Naïve Adults With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB Pharma SARan2012 to 2015Enrolled880ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsCertolizumab Pegol, Placebo, Methotrexate
NCT01521923 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Combination With Methotrexate for Inducing and Sustaining Clinical Response in the Treatment of DMARD-Naïve Adults With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB PharmaRan2012 to 2015Enrolled359ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsCertolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX), Placebo + Methotrexate (MTX)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael E WeinblattBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clifton O BinghamJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gerd-Rüdiger BurmesterCharité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vivian P BykerkWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Daniel E FurstUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Xavier MarietteUniversité Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, INSERM U1184, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Désirée van der HeijdeLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ronald van VollenhovenAmsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brenda VanLunenUCB Pharma, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Cécile EcoffetUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Christopher CioffiUCB Pharma, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Paul EmeryUniversity of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RC-PG-0407-10054Versus Arthritis 18475Versus Arthritis 20639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had achieved sustained low disease activity (a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate of ≤3.2 at both week 40 and week 52) after 1 year of treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP) at a standard dose (200 mg every 2 weeks plus optimized methotrexate [MTX]), we evaluated whether continuation of CZP treatment at a standard dose or at a reduced frequency (200 mg every 4 weeks plus MTX) was superior to stopping CZP (placebo plus MTX) in maintaining low disease activity for 1 additional year.

methodsA total of 293 patients from period 1 of our study were re-randomized 2:3:2 in period 2 to CZP at a standard dose (n = 84), CZP at a reduced frequency (n = 127), or placebo plus MTX (CZP stopped) (n = 82). The primary end point was the percentage of patients who maintained low disease activity throughout weeks 52-104 without flares. We used a hierarchical testing scheme, comparing CZP at a standard dose with CZP stopped. If P < 0.05 was achieved, then CZP at a reduced frequency was compared with CZP stopped (nonresponder imputation).

resultsThe 293 patients from period 1 represented 36% fewer patients than projected, yielding a smaller number of patients eligible for period 2. Higher proportions of patients treated with the standard and reduced frequency regimens maintained low disease activity than those who had stopped CZP (48.8% and 53.2%, respectively, versus 39.2% [P = 0.112 and P = 0.041, respectively; nominal P value, first hierarchical test not significant]). Similar trends were observed for radiographic nonprogression (change from baseline of ≤0.5 in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score; 79.2% and 77.9% of patients, respectively, versus 70.3%) and normative physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score of ≤0.5; 71.4% and 70.6% of patients, respectively, versus 57.0%). Safety profiles were similar between all groups, with no new safety signals identified for continuing CZP to week 104. No deaths were reported.

conclusionThe study failed to meet its primary end point. However, there were no clinically meaningful differences between the standard and reduced frequency doses of CZP plus MTX; both controlled RA more effectively than stopping CZP.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsAdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBlood SedimentationCertolizumab PegolDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRemission InductionAntirheumatic AgentsCertolizumab PegolMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID28666080
PMCPMC5656933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.