ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Independent regulation of gene expression level and noise by histone modifications.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcription initiation drives dosage compensation establishment and maintenance in maleScience advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Gene body methylation buffers noise in gene expression in plants.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- What makes genes burst.Trends in cell biology · 2026Review
- A father's legacy: the sperm epigenome, preimplantation development, and paternal environment.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- The constrained disorder principle emphasizes the importance of variability boundaries for systems to function effectively.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Article
- Identification of molecular determinants of gene-specific bursting patterns by high-throughput imaging screens.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- Identification of molecular determinants of gene-specific bursting patterns by high-throughput imaging screens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Effect of genomic and cellular environments on gene expression noise.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Analysis of developmental gene expression using smFISH andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Cis-regulatory control of transcriptional timing and noise in response to estrogen.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Synergising single-cell resolution and 4sU labelling boosts inference of transcriptional bursting.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Genome-wide inference reveals that feedback regulations constrain promoter-dependent transcriptional burst kinetics.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Distance-dependent inhibition of translation initiation by downstream out-of-frame AUGs is consistent with a Brownian ratchet process of ribosome scanning.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Transcription factor binding process is the primary driver of noise in gene expression.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Hematopoietic differentiation is characterized by a transient peak of entropy at a single-cell level.BMC biology · 2022Article
- The Hda1 histone deacetylase limits divergent non-coding transcription and restricts transcription initiation frequency.The EMBO journal · 2021Article
- Interplay between genetic, epigenetic, and gene expression variability: Considering complexity in evolvability.Evolutionary applications · 2021Review
- Capturing and Understanding the Dynamics and Heterogeneity of Gene Expression in the Living Cell.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inherent stochasticity generates substantial gene expression variation among isogenic cells under identical conditions, which is frequently referred to as gene expression noise or cell-to-cell expression variability. Similar to (average) expression level, expression noise is also subject to natural selection. Yet it has been observed that noise is negatively correlated with expression level, which manifests as a potential constraint for simultaneous optimization of both. Here, we studied expression noise in human embryonic cells with computational analysis on single-cell RNA-seq data and in yeast with flow cytometry experiments. We showed that this coupling is overcome, to a certain degree, by a histone modification strategy in multiple embryonic developmental stages in human, as well as in yeast. Importantly, this epigenetic strategy could fit into a burst-like gene expression model: promoter-localized histone modifications (such as H3K4 methylation) are associated with both burst size and burst frequency, which together influence expression level, while gene-body-localized ones (such as H3K79 methylation) are more associated with burst frequency, which influences both expression level and noise. We further knocked out the only "writer" of H3K79 methylation in yeast, and observed that expression noise is indeed increased. Consistently, dosage sensitive genes, such as genes in the Wnt signaling pathway, tend to be marked with gene-body-localized histone modifications, while stress responding genes, such as genes regulating autophagy, tend to be marked with promoter-localized ones. Our findings elucidate that the "division of labor" among histone modifications facilitates the independent regulation of expression level and noise, extend the "histone code" hypothesis to include expression noise, and shed light on the optimization of transcriptome in evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.