Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28665928›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2017

The role of breast milk in the colonization of neonatal gut and skin with coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Hiie Soeorg, Tuuli Metsvaht, Imbi Eelmäe, Mirjam Merila, Sirli Treumuth, Kristi Huik, Marika Jürna-Ellam, Mari-Liis Ilmoja, Irja Lutsar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. IncreasedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Collection of human bacteria at University of Tartu, Estonia.Microbiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hiie SoeorgDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Tuuli MetsvahtPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Imbi EelmäePaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Mirjam MerilaNeonatal Unit, Children's Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Sirli TreumuthDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Kristi HuikDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Marika Jürna-EllamMicrobiology Department, Laboratory, Diagnostics Division, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.
Mari-Liis IlmojaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tallinn Children's Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.
Irja LutsarDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
University of Tartu · EETartu University Hospital · EENorth Estonia Medical Centre · EETallinn Health Care College · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundWe aimed to determine the genetic relatedness between Staphylococcus epidermidis colonizing breast milk (BM) and BM-fed neonates during the first month of life.MethodsS. epidermidis was isolated from the stool and skin swabs of 20 healthy term and 49 preterm neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit and from the BM of mothers once a week and typed by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. Virulence-related genes were determined by PCR.ResultsThe gut (95%) and skin (100%) of term neonates were colonized with strains genetically similar to those in BM and carrying mecA and IS256 at low rate (both <6.7%). In preterm neonates, colonization with strains genetically similar to those in BM was low on the skin (34.7%) and in the gut in the first week of life (14.3%), but the prevalence of mecA (>90.6%) and IS256 (>61.7%) was high. By the fourth week, in the gut of preterm neonates the prevalence of mecA (73.8%) and IS256 (18.4%) decreased, but colonization with strains genetically similar to those in BM increased (83.7%).ConclusionDuring early life, the skin and gut of preterm neonates is colonized with S. epidermidis that is distinct from strains found in BM, but gradually the gut is enriched with strains genetically similar to those in BM, as in term neonates.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAge FactorsBacterial ProteinsChild DevelopmentDNA, BacterialFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractGenotypeGestational AgeHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialMecA protein, Staphylococcus epidermidis

Identifiers

PMID28665928
OpenAlexW2727565037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.